ACLU

Pierre, SD — The American Civil Liberties Union of South Dakota has just filed a major lawsuit against the South Dakota Department of Social Services, Avera St. Mary’s Hospital, members of the Pierre Police Department, the Sisseton Police Department, and the South Dakota Highway Patrol. The lawsuit is important as it seeks to put a stop to the state’s forced catheterization program that indiscriminately victimizes adults and children alike — all to see if they have an arbitrary substance in their urine.

While it seems that a lawsuit to prevent the state from forcing extremely painful medical procedures on children may be a bit over the top, the fact is, it is entirely necessary. The state of South Dakota, as the Free Thought Project has reported before, has a sordid history of forcing catheterization.

As the ACLU notes, two lawsuits have been filed; one on behalf of a three-year-old child who was forcibly catheterized as a means to collect evidence of child abuse or neglect, and the other on behalf of five adults who were subject to forcible catheterization as part of criminal investigations. All plaintiffs were subjected by law enforcement and state officials to forcible catheterization in violation of the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Dirk Sparks is one of the plaintiffs in the case. In an interview earlier this year, Sparks recalled that horrid night that it happened to him. “It was degrading,” Sparks said. “I was angry. I felt like my civil rights were being violated.”

The nightmare began when police responded to an incident, in which Sparks had done nothing wrong, at his home. However, one officer said he saw Sparks being “fidgety,” so police claimed the right to test his urine.

Advertisment
READ MORE:  Cops Now Stealing Your Stuff to 'Protect You' from People Who Might Steal Your Stuff

Because Sparks refused to pee in a cup for cops, they arrested him and brought him to the hospital.

“I didn’t actually think they were going to go through with it,” Sparks said of the event which left him in pain for weeks and an emotional toll which is still there today. “Even when we went to the hospital, I thought it was a threat.”

But cops followed through with their threat.

Once in the hospital room, four police officers held Sparks down while they placed a hood over his head. He was then chained to a bed with his pants around his ankles while a nurse at Avera St. Mary’s Hospital in Pierre forcefully inserted a pencil-sized tube into Sparks’ urethra to extract his urine involuntarily.

Sparks recalls that through the mesh hood, he could see a fifth officer filming the sadistic torturous practice.

Sparks told the Argus Leader that the pain lasted for weeks and every time he tried to go to the bathroom he was reminded of that torturous event. The kidnapping and forced catheterization were so traumatic for Sparks that he moved away because he now fears the Pierre police.

The second lawsuit involves Kristin Hunter and her three-year-old little boy.

Police intervened after Hunter’s boyfriend was on probation and failed a routine urinalysis. So, multiple cops showed up at her house, along with a Department of Social Services employee and demanded she and her kids produce urine to see if they too had drugs in their system. Hunter’s children were 3 and 5-years-old at the time.

Police told Hunter that if her kids couldn’t pee on demand that they would be taken from her. Luckily, Hunter and her 5-year-old daughter were able to produce a sample. However, the young boy, who wasn’t potty trained yet, was unable to go.

READ MORE:  Police Tried to Convict a Man they Paralyzed, of Assault. He Was Just Found Not Guilty

Police and social workers then held down the child and sexually assaulted him via forced catheterization.

“They just shoved it right up there, and he screamed so bad,” Hunter said.

Because these sadistic cops and social worker were apparently filthy at the time, the poor young toddler contracted a staph infection from the process. “He’s still dealing with a staph infection, and we are still giving him medication,” said Hunter.

“Quite frankly, it’s cruel and barbaric to forcibly catheterize anyone, let alone a 3-year-old child, and this process raises serious constitutional concerns,” said Heather Smith, executive director of the ACLU of South Dakota.

 

“Forcible catheterization is painful, physically and emotionally damaging, and deeply degrading,” said Smith. “Catheterization isn’t the best way to obtain evidence, but it is absolutely the most humiliating. The authorities ordered the catheterization of our clients to satisfy their own sadistic and authoritarian desires to punish. Subjecting anyone to forcible catheterization, especially a toddler, to collect evidence when there are less intrusive means available, is unconscionable.”

Force-catheterizing adults and children is the work of sick tyrants and has no place in the ostensible land of the free. Hitler, the Stasi, and their depraved scientists would be proud.

SHARE
Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project. Follow @MattAgorist on Twitter, Steemit, and now on Facebook.
  • Damiana

    You forgot to mention that they “accidentally” used an ADULT-SIZED catheter, which – if it was “pencil-sized” – would have been over half the diameter of his penis!

    There needs to be more than a lawsuit over this – these people need to be ARRESTED, each and every one, for sexual assault… but of course they WON’T be – that’s not how this works.

    • David Daisy May Boldock

      The average pencil is seven inches long, with just a half-inch eraser – in case you thought optimism was dead.

      • billdeserthills

        I think women should be given a pass on guessing the measure of things, unless they have a ruler in their hands– cause men have been lying for so long about the size of their junk, which makes it perfectly acceptable for the ladies to mistake 6 inches for a foot

        • David Daisy May Boldock

          True enough i concur. Most women can be satisfied with 3.5 inches, whether it be a Visa or Mastercard. 🙂

          • marlene

            LMAO!!!

        • David Daisy May Boldock

          Most women think they really have three boobs. Two on their chest and the man in their life.

          • marlene

            Keep going – I love it.

      • marlene

        We have something even bigger in mind that these vile monsters won’t ever forget and pain like they can’t imagine for the rest of their rotten lives.

  • Steve

    More and more every day I find proof this country has lost its mind. Only a matter of time before it collapses from the BS propaganda, and paranoia. The rein of the American Empire is over.

  • Gordon Klock

    They sadistically abused a three year old, & gave him an internal infection, ostensibly in order to find ‘evidence’, that they probably damn well knew, wasn’t even there….
    I fail to understand how anyone can take these stupid monsters seriously, much less collectively continue to accept this ‘legal’ insanity….

    • Damiana

      *pokes him for no apparent reason*

      • Gordon Klock

        Fixed it, thanks, I do tend to “butcher the king’s English” an awful lot…

        • Damiana

          *grins and changes things, to throw a little mystery afoot*

    • marlene

      People will do what they can get away with. These monsters need to be taken down, painfully, hard, and forever.

  • Jennifer Cummings

    VERY SAD!

  • John C Carleton

    Cops murder people, rape children, run prostitution rings, run drug rings, kidnap people and hold them for ransom.
    CPS kidnaps children and provides them to pedophiles.
    USA-USA-USA-USA!

  • LowellST13

    This is in violation of our constitutional GOD GIVEN RIGHTS and as the article states, cruel. I never thought I would side with anti Christian ACLU, but with this one I am. Would have gone with the American Center for Law And Justice instead…..

    • Wil Post

      ACLU takes more christian cases than anything else, they are far from an anti-christian organization. If you think they are, then you seriously need to educate yourself.

      • LowellST13

        THE ACLU is still firmly entrenched with communist leaning individuals and thoughts, research all they have done in the last 50 years…. sad…

  • Guy

    Jeff Sessions would disagree with all of you and this article as well, with me believing that he, and a lot of the White House Brass, would consider this to be an normal as rain model for good American Police Work !

  • Broos

    Now I’m boycotting SD, too !

  • billdeserthills

    Good on you ACLU it isn’t often that want to donate to your cause
    but I do right now–unfortunately I already spent all my fun money

  • marlene

    This is absolutely shocking, cruel, barbaric, demonic and they ALL should pay for this in the most severe way, such that THEY will feel the pain this poor innocent child victim suffered at their evil hands. We are not going to sit back and do nothing. South Dakota, here we come and we will find these people, every last one of them.

  • marlene

    I will be donating to the UCLU, specifically earmarked for these lawsuits.