school, CPS

A couple from Ohio have found themselves in a troubling custody battle with Child Protective Services for reportedly rejecting a mental health diagnosis of their son urged by the school administration. The disagreement has turned ugly and parents Christian and Katie Maple say they have lost custody of their son over refusing medical treatment that they deemed excessive and unnecessary.

According to a report from Medical Kidnap and Health Impact News, the incident originated in February when the Maples were alerted by their son Camden’s school, Bowman Primary School, that a “disruption” had been caused in class by Camden. Camden had allegedly remarked in class that he was feeling bad about himself and wished that he could be “erased” from the earth.

The Maples say that the school’s counselor chose to follow up on this remark by asking Camden how he would go about erasing himself, and Camden responded that he would “stab himself in the eye with a knife.” Christian then went to the school to retrieve Camden for a discussion at home about the incident.

Advertisment

The Maples claim that they had a lengthy discussion following the incident. Camden said that he was feeling upset that day, but didn’t wish actual harm upon himself and made the remarks to see what the counselor’s reaction would be. Katie further explained that “The school thought we should have taken him to the hospital emergency room for a mental health evaluation, but upon assessing the situation and speaking to him at home, it was clear to us that he posed no threat to himself and just said it to get a rise out of the counselor. He has never said anything about harming himself prior to this incident or after. This was one time, one day…most likely repeating something he heard somewhere.”

READ MORE:  Horrifying Video Captures Cop Punching 9-Months Pregnant Woman in Front of her Children

While the school had reportedly urged the Maples to seek an emergency mental health evaluation of Camden, the parents felt that they had properly handled the situation and chose not to send Camden to the emergency room for an evaluation. The school reportedly pressed the matter further, asking the Maples if they had taken Camden to the hospital and inquiring about what they had discussed with Camden.

The Maples said that the school contacted CPS after their conversation, and that this was not the first time the school had done so. Katie Maple provided the following context regarding how she and the school have clashed in the past over how to raise Camden:

My stepson Camden is a very energetic and intelligent 7 year old. He tested a full grade level above where he should be! Camden gets very good grades, but he gets bored easily in class and acts out on occasion, like children sometimes do. The school thinks he is ADHD, we as parents disagree. We believe that it stems mostly from boredom and not being challenged in the classroom. The school has tried on several occasions to get us to have him diagnosed, so that he can be medicated. We as parents do not have the problems the school claims to have with him, at home. We know how to deal with a rambunctious 7 year old, but the school is content with making him believe that he is a bad child, we disagree.
The school did not like us going against their recommendations and proceeded to call children services 4 times over the course of the past year for false allegations ranging from physical abuse, neglect and no food in the house. We have no idea where these allegations came from, as we do not abuse our children and we have plenty of food. They were obviously completely made up. CPS never contacted us about these phone calls because they themselves admit that the calls were unsubstantiated.

Christian Maple said that he received a call from CPS after the incident at Camden’s school regarding a report of neglect; he said that CPS requested a home visit to “investigate.” Christian declined to grant permission to have CPS come into their home and said he reminded the agency of his 4th Amendment rights. Christian said he then received another call from CPS, about 2 weeks after the original incident, alerting him that he had a court hearing to attend that afternoon about the incident. “Upon appearing in court we find out that the allegations have now changed from neglect to a “dependent child” case,” Katie said. “We find out that this is an ‘Emergency shelter care’ hearing later, we had no idea what we were walking into.”

READ MORE:  Judge Who Took Kids from Off-Grid Family, Same Judge who Killed his Own Son and Wasn't Arrested

The Maples said that at this hearing, CPS sought to remove Camden from his home by claiming that the child has a mental disorder that requires him to be placed in custody of CPS. During this hearing, the court granted CPS permission to take him out of his family’s care and into custody of CPS. Katie said that this was done with “zero proof of any such condition and zero proof of any parental wrongdoing.”

A common argument heard within the public school system is that students who are victims of neglect need administrators and counselors to step in and assist in behavior-related incidents. This case appears to be a worrisome overstepping of parental authority; there is no evidence of depression or other behavioral issues in Camden provided thus far, and the Maple family appears steadfast in their dedication to handle any issue their son may face. Removal of a child from his home, which was once only conducted in extreme cases with hard evidence of mistreatment, is an action that holds drastic consequences for the entire family.

A hearing in the Maple family case was scheduled on March 23rd, and an adjudication hearing is set for April 20th.

“My husband and I have talked with lawyers, counselors, friends and family and everyone agrees that this does not add up and what CPS and the court has done is wrong and not typical protocol. They have no case for abuse or neglect and are now fishing for a reason to justify their actions. They have ordered my husband and I to undergo a drug and alcohol screening, random drug tests and a mental health evaluation,” said Katie. “We have completed the evaluations. Our evaluator was thoroughly confused as to why we were even in her office and could not believe the situation that had brought us there. We have zero substance abuse issues. We do not do drugs and have never been accused of such. We have zero mental health issues. Why would they order us to do this? Again, another fishing attempt to try to find a reason for justifying their actions.”

SHARE
New Hampshire-based writer Annabelle Bamforth is focused on breaking the left/right paradigm through new media and local politics. Annabelle is the editor-in-chief of Emmy-winning journalist Ben Swann's Truth In Media Project and a producer for Mr. Swann's Truth In Media episodes.
  • Dustin Warden

    Some children need medication. It’s true. That being said, it sounds like the parents irritated the school and cps and were deemed unfit. I think part of the story is missing.

    • Lu

      I agree. The story appears very one sided. CPS does not kidnap children. Kidnapping is illegal. Only a judge in a courtroom can authorize a removal.

  • Lu

    I see red flags all over this story. It’s against the law for a school to suggest or even mention medication. My guess is that it was never mentioned. They probably urged for a diagnosis in order to be able to provide the most appropriate services to the child in school. As for CPS, when a child makes any mention of harming themselves it is mandated that it is reported to CPS. The school would have been breaking the law if they had not reported it. It was then CPS’s job to make sure the child is safe. Legally, they must follow protocol in order to determine if the child is safe. The family can participate and provide information that shows the child is safe in order to help resolve the assessment, however if the family isn’t cooperating, how is CPS to know if the child is safe. Had this child hurt himself, people would be crying out that CPS is not doing it’s job. It just seems that the family is reporting that the school, CPS, and the legal system are all against them. I find it hard to believe that so many agencies and individuals have it out for this family. I believe this is a story of a family who doesn’t want to take responsibility and wants to be the victim.

    • allie B

      It is against the law for schools and non medical school staff to make medical recommendations, and schools do it all of the time. I had that battle nearly a decade ago, and people I know are still having that battle with the school system here and across the country.

      This is what happened to our family. My son’s school insisted he be put on ADHD meds if he was to continue in 4k. I pulled him out following all legal procedures (children in our state were not even required to attend school at all until six years of age), filing all paperwork, and DSS (our state’s CPS) was on my doorstep within the week. Luckily it is a small community and I had worked with DSS as a tutor for foster children, and as a rape crisis counselor so the agent that came to my door knew me. Who knows what would have happened if that were not the case. Schools overstep their authority on a regular basis, especially when the parents dare to question that “authority”. They pick and choose who to report – “non-compliant” parents top the list. If this were the only story out there about government agencies overstepping where medical privacy issues and educational decisions were concerned, I might agree with you. This type of thing has happened way too many times in recent years.

  • Francesco M. DiGiovanni

    Messed up situation. If the parents are correct and the school is incorrect, then I hope the family eventually prevails and gets their child back in their home.

  • allie B

    Homeschooling is legal in all 50 states. No states are working towards making homeschooling illegal. Public school systems do not have to pay for books or other materials for home schooled students. If you want information on homeschooling laws in your state check the HSLDA website.