Home / Foreign Affairs / The Times Are Changing: Assange Goes on FOX News and Destroys the Russia Hack Conspiracy Theory

The Times Are Changing: Assange Goes on FOX News and Destroys the Russia Hack Conspiracy Theory

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange came forward after a long period of silence for a video interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity — in particular, to decimate claims leaked emails from the Democratic establishment had been hacked and provided by Russian government actors.

“The narrative has begun that, in fact, the U.S. government is accusing Wikileaks of having received materials from Russia and Russia’s cybercriminals with the political agenda of influencing the election. And obviously they’re talking, not just about the John Podesta emails, the DNC emails, but in other ways. I’ve asked you before, I’ll ask you again today — did Russia give you this information, or anybody associated with Russia?” Hannity asked.

“Our source is not a State party,” Assange told Hannity, once again confirming assertions he and Wikileaks have made on previous occasions. “So, the answer for our interactions is ‘no.’”

Continuing, he explained the political establishment has attempted to distract from the revelations in the leaked documents — which exposed the true words of Clinton and others in her campaign,

“And the American public read that information, true information, and said, ‘We don’t like these people.’ And then voted accordingly.”

Rather than acknowledge the breadth of corruption and behind-the-curtains nastiness on display in the documents, the establishment has attempted to conflate Wikileaks with Russians hacking the election — an accusation Assange explained amounted to bait-and-switch, as,

“Even Obama has had to admit that there was no hacking of U.S. voting machines.”

“But … the main focus for most Americans is that, they are being told by Hillary Clinton’s campaign, by the President of the United States, there are the Department of Homeland Security, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, et cetera, that in fact,” Hannity asked, “that Wikileaks was working with the Russian government to influence the election. Is that true in any way, shape, matter, or form?”

“No, it is absolutely false,” Assange replied, “and, if you read their statements carefully, you’ll see they don’t actually say that. They kind of mention one fact here, and one fact there, and nothing else.

“In the most up-to-date information, the twenty-ninth of December, where the FBI, DHS, White House, et cetera, made a statement, what is completely absent — from all those statements — is Wikileaks. Totally absent. So, what’s going on?

“I believe two things are going on. Number one, they don’t have the evidence that Wikileaks is involved in that way. Now, why am I confident about that? Because there is one person in the world — and I think it’s actually only one — who knows exactly what is going on with our publications. And that’s me.”

Asked whether he could state “unequivocally” the information published by Wikileaks did not come from any person associated in any way with the Russian government, Assange stated,

“We can say, and we have said repeatedly over the last few months, our source is not the Russian government, and it is not a State party.”

Again refusing to comment on the clarifying details concerning the source of documents leaked to the publishing organization, Assange emphasized that — although he could not confirm or deny reports from close friend and former British intelligence agent, Craig Murray the leaker came from within the Democratic establishment — “our sources are not a State party.”

READ MORE:  WikiLeaks: Hillary Took $12 Mil for Clinton Foundation from Country She Declared Human Rights Violators

Hannity then directly requested clarification for several accusations bandied about by the United States political establishment, asking if Assange had ever conversed with Russian President Vladimir Putin, to which he replied flatly, “No.”

“Have you ever talked to any of his surrogates?” the host continued.


“Have you ever talked to Donald Trump?” Hannity asked, addressing suspicions Wikileaks had acted on behalf of the billionaire businessman’s campaign.


“Any of his surrogates?”


“Not one?” Hannity prodded.

“No,” Assange firmly responded.

“There was some report you might have talked to someone who was not associated with the campaign, Roger Stone?”

“No. That’s false.”

Claiming The Russians hacked anything has been largely a creation of the corporate press and politicians, and, as he explains, Obama is “acting like a lawyer,” and “If you look at most of his statements, he doesn’t say that. He doesn’t say that WikiLeaks obtained its information from Russia, or worked with Russia.”

Addressing one of the most frequently touted ideas that leaked documents influenced the election in order to sway the election for Donald Trump, Assange noted it would be impossible to tell for sure, but,

“If it did, the accusation is that the true statements of Hillary Clinton and her campaign manager, John Podesta, and the DNC head, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz — their true statements is what changed the election.”

Discussing millions of documents hacked by the Chinese, about which the aforementioned parties and the Obama administration have selectively chosen not to focus, Hannity asked whether Assange felt the move was intended to “delegitimize Donald Trump — what’s your interpretation of that?”

Assange explained, “It is exactly what it is designed to do … If you look at what the allegations are, they don’t mention Wikileaks, for the 29th, they don’t mention our publications. Our publications had wide uptake by the American people. They’re all true. But that’s not the allegation that’s been presented by the Obama White House. So, why such a dramatic response? Well, the reason is obvious: they’re trying to delegitimize the Trump administration as it goes into the White House. They’re going to try — they are trying to say that President-elect Trump is not a legitimate” president.

The Wikileaks head went on to explain the Democratic Party continues to attempt “short term wins” in such criticisms, while ignoring the factual substance of leaked documents — and the American people “want as much true information as possible.”

Wikileaks has been vilified for not releasing documents pertaining to Trump or his campaign — but, as Assange has repeatedly contended, no such documents were provided to the publisher.

“If the information you had was about Donald Trump and his campaign,” Hannity asked, “would you have equally released that?”

“Yes,” Assange responded without hesitation. “Absolutely.”

READ MORE:  BREAKING: UN to Free Assange, Final Ruling Says 'Arbitrary Detention' Must End

Murray, Assange’s associate — and former intelligence officials entirely unassociated with Wikileaks — have suggested the documents were leaked by a disgruntled party inside the Democratic establishment. On that topic, after Assange noted the perfect record Wikileaks has maintained in regard to authenticity of documents and refusal to expose the identity of sources, Hannity asked, since the leaker was not Russian,

“Can I ask … take it one step further. Can you say that the source was within the United States?”

After a frustrated pause, Assange replied, “I don’t want to constrain whether it was someone inside the United States, in the DNC, in the service providers that provide for the DNC, or outside, et cetera. I think that we have already pushed it quite a lot … more than we would like, by saying it was not a State party.”

But speaking out with that qualification had been a necessity as “there was a serious attempt to distract from the content of our publications with this Russian narrative.”

On the joint report from DHS and the FBI, Assange noted the tools provided as loose evidence of Russian hacking are commercially available — to anyone — and nothing laid out by the agencies evinced solid proof.

Additionally, Podesta’s careless choice of “password” for his password, and his staff’s erroneous assertion the infamous phishing email he received was legitimate, Assange said,

“This is something a fourteen-year-old kid — a fourteen-year-old kid — could have hacked Podesta that way.”

On the topic of corporate media’s lack of coverage of the content of the leaked documents — and exposed collusion with the Clinton campaign — Assange described the American mainstream press as “ethically corrupt.”

READ MORE:  Mainstream Media's Russian/Aide Story is Fake News by Their Own Definition

Despite allegations Assange and his organization had been somehow motivated to influence the election in favor of Trump, he noted,

“My motivation, for twenty years — ten years with Wikileaks — is to publish true information that is otherwise unassailable.”

Emphasizing he has no party political agenda, he added,

“We believe that the best type of government comes from a government that is scrutinized by the people, when they have true information about how governments and major corporations, other power actors in society, are behaving.”

Assange has been confined for years in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London under threat of extradition to the United States — effectively making him a political prisoner. But vociferous anti-Russia rhetoric and allegations Russian hackers provided documents to Wikileaks forced Assange to come forward — first in an interview on Hannity’s radio program, and then this face-to-face interview — to call out the claims as hollow and baseless.

Although mainstream media has parroted these allegations against Russia, perhaps hearing Assange’s words in this rare appearance will help quiet the new Red Scare propaganda — and bring logic and common sense back to the table.


    This entire scenario stinks of the F.B.I. attempting to cover their own meddling in the election by blaming it on Russia. That is my first conclusion. There are some suckers in the mix, it should not fostered on the American citizens. In absence of the truth one must evaluate for themselves. The joke is on us.

  • doucyet

    The Clinton mafia machine is out of business and they can’t stand it. The people have spoken and just like the last two elections we’ll simply have see what happens………we can’t be any worse off that’s for sure!
    Looking beyond all of the hype and brainwashing, I believe many of the people that have been freaking out about Trump will be pleasantly surprised by his leadership.

  • Inge Beernaert

    Fox news needs more views, They have already a very bad reputation. By interviewing Assange they try to regain confidence.

    • permalink

      “Fox news needs more views”

      With such “a bad reputation” how has Fox News been in the top of the news market for years? That “rating” information can easily be found.

      And before you go slamming me for watching Fox News, I live in the sticks, and do not have cable or satellite service. Over-the-air TV only, so I could not watch if I wanted to…

      • Razedbywolvs

        All the networks are dieing and desperately trying to stay relent. Fox is trying to stay relevant to Brightbart not FOX vs MSNBC. The web rankings can easily be found.
        It’s pretty easy to keep a good reputation when your one of 6 news companies that have
        the FCC to crush any dissenting opinion that deviates from the narrative they all want to push.
        Who owns FOX news.. Rupert Murdock and Saudi prince Alwaleed bin tallia.
        Who donated millions to the Clinton campaign.. Alwaleed bin talli.
        Who as secretary of defense paid Muslim extremist’s to behead Christens in the Middle east and why.
        Fox has a bad reputation for good reason. You don’t get a good reputation for being a better lier than than the other guy.

        • permalink

          “I live in the sticks, and do not have cable or satellite service. Over-the-air TV only, so I could not watch if I wanted to…”

          I thought I said I do not/ cannot watch Fox News, but your tinfoil hat kept you from seeing the words.

  • The most amusing part of this is the serfs (the 99%) that actually believe their vote makes a difference. You were living in an Oligarchy yesterday, still are today and you will be living in one tomorrow also.

    The Oligarchy won the election, you lost.

    Owned & Operated

  • Free_Willey

    I have never seen Hannity be so gracious while interviewing anyone! It shows that Hannity does have journalism ability but never uses it (exception here). Assange easily and concisely answers questions in a straightforward way. I do not ever see this kind of journalism in America anymore.

    • permalink

      “I do not ever see this kind of journalism in America anymore”

      Hannity is by no means a journalist, and has never claimed to be one. He only likes to hear himself talk.

      • laura.burton.1992

        I’ve made $84 ,000 till now this season working over the internet moreover I am only a full time student . I’m taking advantage of a web business project I observed and even I’ve earned such type of decent earnings . It is really so easy to use not to mention I am just very satisfied that I discovered out about that . The possibility with this is end-less . Here’s everything I do>>>

  • Will Wam

    The lefties are so nasty that they will propagate lies to try to cling to power. They only believe in democracy when their candidate wins. It’s a relief Trump got elected to break up the career politicians corruption and collusion. Trump will make America great again.

    • billdeserthills

      Mr Trump has already done more to help American workers than obama ever did and he isn’t even sworn in yet!

  • JGJG

    He’s just doing JOURNALISM! DUH?

  • Eric Bolt

    The FBI & Home Land Insecurity were criminal involved w/ 9/11 & pre -9/11-! these terrorist were behind all false Intelligence going back long before the USS Cole-! think Zacharius Mosoui was the 1st false flag terrorist, criminally charged to fly one of Dick Cheney’s Drone missiles on 9/11 on 9/11 what did he say later He lied the FBI is the most criminal incompetent terrorist ridden Agency-! think how many 9/11 terrorist, were working inside the Dept of Homeland Insecurity-????? dozens & Dozens-! this years before you heard of it like DIA TSA etc.. all criminally conspired against you before 9/11

  • TheVoiceHere

    “We believe that the best type of government comes from a government that is scrutinized by the people, when they have true information about how governments and major corporations, other power actors in society, are behaving.”

    When one reviews publications by Wikileaks, this motivation becomes quite crystal clear. Wikileaks is not in the business of providing a ‘fair and balanced’ opinion. It is in the business of exposing material that those in power want to hide from the public to cover up their underhanded and often criminal behavior.

    If you want to get closest to the truth, experience it firsthand. If you can’t, then find out directly from someone who has first-hand experience. Go to the documents, go to the source, not opinion pieces about the documents, nor opinion pieces about the opinion pieces about the documents.

    I applaud Wikileaks for providing a journalistic outlet for information that otherwise would be completely invisible to the public. We now see that democracy works when people are given the truth about their candidates. It is my hope that Americans continue to be well-informed and vote accordingly.

  • canucanoe2

    Can’t help but hate Hannity. Gotta LOVE Assange, though.

    • permalink

      Sure, but information is information, regardless of who it comes through, right?