Home / Badge Abuse / Bombshell: Co-creator of Civil Asset Forfeiture Wants to Abolish It, No More Policing for Profit

Bombshell: Co-creator of Civil Asset Forfeiture Wants to Abolish It, No More Policing for Profit

Co-creator-of-Civil-Asset-Forfeiture-Wants-to-Abolish-It,-No-More-Policing-for-Profit

One of the most insidious abuses of state power lies in the practice of civil asset forfeiture (CAF), where government agents can seize cash and property from citizens who are not charged with a crime. Law enforcement needs only the suspicion (often concocted) of a crime to immediately steal a person’s belongings, and the person must then prove his or her innocence with costly attorney’s fees to get their property back.

The case of Joseph Rivers, 22, provides a shocking example of how bad it can get. While on his way to Hollywood to start a music career, the DEA stole Rivers’ life savings of $16,000 on the made-up suspicion that he must be involved in drugs, even though there was no evidence whatsoever. He has yet to get this money back.

Since CAF was created by the federal government in the 1980s to fight organized crime, law enforcement has seized upon it to develop, like a drug addiction, something known as “policing for profit.” Billions of dollars are stolen every year to feed a lust for more equipment, training, and personnel to further entrench the police state.

However, the tide is turning. New Mexico has become the first state to make serious reform, as it has abolished civil asset forfeiture by requiring a criminal conviction to seize assets. The law puts the funds derived from criminal convictions into the state treasury, rather than state and local law enforcement.

The city of Albuquerque, which used to rake in $1 million a year from CAF, is incensed over the loss of its cash cow and is refusing to follow the law. It continues to seize vehicles without a conviction and has even built a new parking lot for all the cars it intends to steal.

More states, such as Virginia, Oklahoma, and New Hampshire, are considering reform as the abuses of CAF come to light. Noble law enforcement officers are speaking out as well. Last September, we interviewed Stephen Mills, chief of police of the Apache, OK police department, who is a vocal critic of CAF.

And now, a bombshell has been dropped which will surely accelerate moves across the country to end this injustice.

One of the creators of civil asset forfeiture has just called for it to be abolished. Brad Cates, former director of the U.S. Justice Department’s Asset Forfeiture Office (1985-89), wrote an opinion in the Wall Street Journal acknowledging that CAF has turned into policing for profit.

“During the Reagan administration I helped establish these programs because I believed they would quickly channel seized criminals’ profits into the fight against organized crime and drug cartels. Yet over time we have created a new bad incentive: policing for profit, out of the reach of the proper legislative budget process.”

Cates references a study performed by the Institute for Justice which found that the Justice Department’s Assets Forfeiture Fund exploded from $93.7 million in 1986 to $4.5 billion in 2014. The study also found that “just 13% of Justice Department forfeitures from 1997-2013 were criminal forfeitures, while 87% were civil forfeitures.”

“Considering the intertwined financial incentives, reform must happen at both the state and federal level. States and the federal government can look to what New Mexico had done as a template for broad-based action.

Three decades ago I helped create our civil asset forfeiture system; now it is time to end it.”

Clearly, the intent of the original law has been thoroughly abused at all levels of government. The Justice Department caved to pressure in 2015 when it suspended its “equitable sharing” program which allowed local police to skirt state-level efforts of reform. That hasn’t stopped cops in most states from continuing to loot and pillage the citizenry.

Cates still endorses the war on drugs, which creates crime and misery, but acknowledges that “states taking assets from untried individuals who are easily summoned before the courts is unconscionable.”

When the man who helped create civil asset forfeiture says it’s time to end it, this is a powerful message to cops who revel in stealing from innocent citizens under the guise of fighting crime. Addiction is a hard thing to kick, as law enforcement will soon find out.

To find out how badly your state engages in CAF, check out the groundbreaking survey conducted by the Institute for Justice, titled Policing for Profit.

  • Help us spread the word about the police accountability movement by clicking ‘Like’ + Share + Comment (even 2 words) Thank you!

    • What he said

    • so the first thing on this meme is not shooting dogs?? really? how about shooting thousands of civilians, almost all of them young black men?? of course it’s fucked up when the cops shoot a family’s pet, they shouldn’t be shooting anything or anyone, unless that’s the absolute LAST RESORT.but that’s not how things are done, is it?

  • “I have the deepest affection for intellectual conversations. The ability to just sit and talk. About love, about life, about anything, about everything. To sit under the moon with all the time in the world, the full-speed train that is our lives slowing to a crawl. Bound by no obligations, barred by no human limitations. To speak without regret or fear of consequence. To talk for hours and about what’s really important in life.”

    • As much as I will respect your comment, I must say that it has nothing to do with this post. SMH

  • You cannot close Pandora’s box.

  • Tell this co-creator to fuck himself for partaking in its creation.

  • There are a lot of people that will say or do nothing about this until it happens to them. If there is nothing else you think you can do how about just being really angry about it and supporting the people that are stepping forward and trying to stop it.

  • …..

  • Cates still endorses the war on drugs…but acknowledges that “states taking assets…is unconscionable.”

    I find it unconscionable that Cates still endorses the war on drugs. Isnt it partly because of the war on drugs that the CAF was even instituted?!

  • small stuff compared to bankers and politicians. but in a culture of produce and consume, theft is a form of production.

  • I may write more tomorrow…

    But the police should never ever be in the money business, ever. Or even close to money.

    Former cop, spike in blood pressure. I’ll write tomorrow. Got to go to take my psych meds. I’m triggered ☹…. See you tomorrow.

  • scottsacco

    Years ago, after reading story after story of all types of auto, property, bank account and on-the-spot cash seizures I realized that the true scum of the Earth was exempt from these procedures. I researched this, although common sense supports my assertion, that rapists, murderers, street thugs, etc. rarely if ever had their assets forfeited/seized simply because they either don’t have anything, no one knows where there assets are kept, or the law simply doesn’t provide for it or push the incentives that police have when pulling a car over, frisking citizens or raiding homes. A person with a severed head in his trunk is arrested and goes to jail. A person with an 8-ball of coke also goes to jail, and depending if its in the car or house, gets their cash, auto, home and bank account seized. A murder defendandant has many more avenues in legal defense processes than does the drug defendant. For starters, the probable cause to search. All a cop needs to say is “I smelled pot” or “a C.I. claimed he made a purchase” for probable cause to search or raid for drugs. Try the equivalent lame justification for evidence gathering on the murder suspect. The D.A. would halt it before it could ever reach the court, if not, a judge would toss the case like a dirty diaper!

Close