Home / BREAKING NEWS / BREAKING: Clinton Foundation Hacked Exposing Mega Donor List, Massive “Pay To Play” Scheme

BREAKING: Clinton Foundation Hacked Exposing Mega Donor List, Massive “Pay To Play” Scheme

Less than 24 hours after Julian Assange disappointed many with the failure to release a major “October Surprise” leak of documents — widely rumored to be detrimental to Hillary Clinton’s political career — Guccifer 2.0 struck again, releasing an enormous cache of documents putatively obtained during previous access to Clinton Foundation files.

Guccifer 2.0 — a hacker or group of hackers whose identity(ies) remain unknown — was previously responsible for disclosing stores of documents from the Democratic National Committee and DNCC, which, of course, ultimately led to the resignation of five key players in the Democratic Party — including the much-maligned Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

On the website run by Guccifer 2.0 — who claims not to be a hacker, but, rather, a persistent opportunist — he, she, or they write:

“Many of you have been waiting for this, some even asked me to do it.

“So, this is the moment. I hacked the Clinton Foundation server and downloaded hundreds of thousands of docs and donors’ databases.”

More pointedly, considering the security of Hillary Clinton’s unsanctioned personal server stands at the heart of ongoing scandal, Guccifer 2.0 adds:

“Hillary Clinton and her staff don’t even bother about the information security. It was just a matter of time to gain access to the Clinton Foundation server.”

Among the newly leaked cache, one of the most telling items is a screenshot of a root directory, flagrantly titled, “Pay to Play.”


Detailed lists of thousands of donors, their employers, titles, contributions, and much more, have now finally seen the light of day — but Guccifer’s Clinton Foundation document cache goes even further than the basics of whose cash ended up in whose pocket.

The cache includes donations made by financial corporations and their executives, and perhaps most damaging of all — albeit with little referential context — a spreadsheet Guccifer intimates, if he is correct, might show not only a conflict of interest, but potentially illegal contributions made to the Democratic Party:



“It looks like big banks and corporations agreed to donate to the Democrats a certain percentage of the allocated TARP funds.”

READ MORE:  WikiLeaks Exposes Hillary's Stunning Connection to ISIS -- Mainstream Media Blackout Ensues


TARP, the Troubled Asset Relief Program, was the massive bailout of the Big Banks during the subprime mortgage crisis that nearly decimated much of the world’s economy. Taxpayers were forced to shoulder the burden for the criminally corrupt banks’ reckless pursuit of profit through horridly unpalatable loans granted to risky clientele.

If taxpayer relief funds were allocated directly into contributions to a political party, as Guccifer suggests, it would constitute a massive conflict of interest with enormous repercussions.

Damning as that Guccifer’s description sounds, however, the list appears to be missing a great deal of information — possibly whole columns of the spreadsheet not included at all.

This unknown opportunist or hacker claims they have such a volume of information still forthcoming, that “I can’t post all databases here for they’re too large. I’m looking for a better way to release them now.”

There will undoubtedly be further revelations from this leak, due to the cache’s size and intriguing details.

Guccifer 2.0 seemed to take a snide jab at Julian Assange — who celebrated Wikileaks’ 10th birthday overnight, but failed to release long-awaited documents of his own.

“P.S. I’m pleased to congratulate Wikileaks on their 10th anniversary!!!” Guccifer writes.

“Julian, you are really cool! Stay safe and sound!”

  • wanagiakicita

    Zero percent credibility and it will not be accepted as anything but a ploy to take down the Democratic candidate…..won’t work….bye!

    • Guy

      Do you think if you can dig a hole deep and large enough to fit all of you, who refuse to believe in anything other than, Hillary is the 2nd coming of the Immaculate Conception savor of the Democrat Party, along with her Patron Saint Soros .

      That it will just all go, magicly away ? Leaving you, she and the rest of the Liberal Democrats fit for duty, to establish her vision of the New World Order ?

      Fat chance that ! Is ever going to happen !

      • anna miller

        It is truly amazing their level of brainwashing. They are literally like young children, with their fingers in their ears, going nananananana! as you attempt to get them to listen to reason. I’m no big fan of Trump, as he speaks of building up the war machine, but the Clintons are a perfect example of clinical psychopaths. good comment Guy, thanks for the belly laughs!

        • Guy

          Thank’s and You’re Welcome 😉

    • Hydejustice

      Bloop, and there goes your head right up the old tail pipe…
      Wont work, bye

      • sallyho3000 .

        Seriously amateur trolling…

  • TheCushite

    Good job, excellent work! The Queen of corruption can fool democrat tea party trolls, but progressives aren’t fooled.

    • lawmanjed

      LOL, what? Progessives aren’t fooled? The left, Hillary’s left, are “the progressives”. The NWO are “progressives”. Democrat tea party? Wtf is that? The modern “team party” movement was a conservative-based movement originally started by Ron Paul, was then co-opted by and associated with the republicans. You need to study your American politics better before you get paid to troll comments sections.

  • Really_seriously_now

    Maybe Guccifer did this in collaboration with Assange considering Clinton threatened his life. Well all know how her detractors wind up accidentally dead.

  • I signed up to receive emails from Guccifer 2.0. I read his release earlier today. I saw his congratulatory note to Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. And I didn’t think that it was all at all a snide remark.

    • stacy.taylor.90

      I benefit something like 6000-8000 dollars every month from freelancing at home. Those who are prepared to work simple computer-based task for some hrs daily at your house and make valuable salary for doing it… Then this job opportunity is for you… http://fave.co/2bocRGL

  • True to Progressives

    Julian sd in talk that the US govt was sanctioning Ecuador because of him & that was a problem. And he spoke abt the future of Wikileaks w or without would continue.

  • So who do you vote for? Trump is a Fascist and third parties, according to the MSM, don’t stand a chance.

    Or you can begin looking for the fix outside of the existing system:

    Owned & Operated



  • Robin W. Tong

    1. he says he can’t find anyplace to host the info online, yet he had plenty of space to download everything, and nothing is stopping him from sending copies to Wikileaks and media the world over. 2. the teaser spreadsheet snapshots contain information that anyone can get from public records. 3. In order to view or attempt to verify the links he had provided to a linked selection of files, you have to click on links that create a socketed connection / virtual private network between your computer and his host computer, AND DOWNLOAD FILES ONTO YOUR COMPUTER TO OPEN ON YOUR COMPUTER BYPASSING MOST SECURITY AND VIRUS SCANS. If your computer doesn’t autoscan the download, you can still manually run a scan before opening the files… but each of these steps has their own exploits and vulnerabilities and in tandem create a hell of a vulnerability for anyone attempting to verify his story.

    still waiting for the files to be dumped in a wiki stylized format for the public to review, and for the hack / dump to be independently verified.

  • IE10

    The Clinton Foundation is a charitable presidential foundation (as all former US presidents have in cluding the GOP presidents) scoring highly in charitable ranking on spending money on real charitable work (about 86% of donations are used for charitable work). It is not a foundation for funding the democrats nor for funding the elections.
    Unlike the ‘charitable’ foundation used by Donald Trump that was illegaly raising funds in NY, accepting money for tickets scheme and was used to pay non-charitable Trump expenses.

    • Guy

      Okay. That could make sense.

      So please explain away what the “Pay To Play’ scheme is ?

      This ought to be good !

    • billdeserthills

      You are a lying sack of crap, clintons foundation uses only slightly over 5% of the donation money for charitable purposes–Lie to someone else, hillary luving pos

    • anna miller

      You need to do more research on the Clinton Foundation. Observe what they did in Haiti, mighty psychopathic of them to take money donated by average people to help the Haitians and then profit and allow corporations to get the money for donating part of that money to the Clinton Foundation. This used to be known as “kick-backs” now called “pay to play”.

      How the Clinton Foundation Ripped Off Hait, 15 minutes