Home / Education / One Detailed Chart Exposes Exactly How the Bilderberg Group Controls the World

One Detailed Chart Exposes Exactly How the Bilderberg Group Controls the World

Dresden, Germany – It’s one of the most secretive and powerful organizations you’ve probably never heard of; the Bilderberg Group. With virtually no mainstream corporate media coverage of the event, the ultra-exclusive 2016 meeting of the Bilderberg Group, being held at the Taschenbergpalais hotel in Dresden, kicked off on June 9.

Nearly 130 politicians, financiers, and industrialists are attending this year’s conference, with the guest list including the chief of the International Monetary Fund, as well as the former heads of the CIA and MI6. What was once considered among the world’s most secretive meetings, the Bilderberg Meeting, has been held annually since 1954. Until recent decades, the actual existence of the meetings had been generally disregarded by the mainstream media as nothing more than a fringe “conspiracy theory.”

The annual meeting of the global power players — including representatives from government, private industry, media, finance, think tanks, academia, as well as numerous other organizations representing both private and public interests — began their closed-door sessions amid a heavily-armed security presence, and extremely little in the way of transparency — with journalist being arrested.

“No minutes will be taken. No reporters will be allowed in. There will be no opening press conference, no closing statement, and participants will be asked not to quote each other,” the UK Independent says of the 64th Bilderberg Conference, which began on Thursday at the Taschenbergpalais hotel in Dresden, Germany.

Participants are bound by what’s known as the Chatham House Rule, which allows people to make use of the information they’ve received, but not reveal the identity or affiliation of the person who gave it to them. With so many high-powered attendees and so little media coverage, many question the actual intent of the annual meeting.

Some perceive the gathering as a giant “corporate lobbying” event, while others assign more nefarious intentions of creating regimes of global governance to the meetings. The one thing that is certain is that the gathering allows for the world’s power players to meet in secret and have “off the record” discussions without the public being aware of the details discussed, nor the informal agreements agreed to by attendees.

“All those finance ministers sitting round discussing the ‘geopolitics of energy and commodity prices’ with the group chief executive of BP, the vice-chairman of Portuguese petroleum giant Galp Energia, and the CEO of Royal Dutch Shell. And then afterwards saying nothing to their respective parliaments about what they discussed. It’s so off-the-chart inappropriate that it beggars comprehension,” according to The Guardian.

Make no mistake that the fortunes of kings are created at this event, as the fates of future presidents and prime ministers have seemingly been decided at Bilderberg.

“Bill Clinton was a conference attendee in 1991, as a mere governor of Arkansas, a year before he was elected U.S. President. Tony Blair was only a shadow minister when he got his invitation … in 1993,” said The Independent.

Coincidentally, (or more likely not) Blair became the prime minister of the United Kingdom in 1997.

While there is a publicly posted agenda, this does little in the way of allowing for the public to have an informed say in, or understanding of the frameworks and decisions made in these private meetings between some of the most powerful individuals in society, who essentially control the levers of Western power, and whose decisions have an inordinate amount of influence over the lives of almost every person on the planet.

Considering that these attendees have such a significant presence within private industry, state and global governance, and the overall geopolitical direction of the world, the fact that the details are hidden from public purview is deeply disturbing to anyone that believes in an accountable and transparent global society.

To help readers better understand this complicated web of top-down control, Zero Hedge has created a chart laying out the linkages and various connections of those in attendance. The graphic below exposes various connections and links – public, private, financial, political, statutory and otherwise – between a small group of individuals that are at the core of Bilderberg and the rest of the world.

Click to expand image.

bilderberg group_1

Jay Syrmopoulos is a political analyst, free thinker, researcher, and ardent opponent of authoritarianism. He is currently a graduate student at University of Denver pursuing a masters in Global Affairs. Jay’s work has been published on Ben Swann’s Truth in Media, Truth-Out, Raw Story, MintPress News, as well as many other sites. You can follow him on Twitter @sirmetropolis, on Facebook at Sir Metropolis and now on tsu.
  • There is something very hinky about this powerful Bilderberg Group.

    There are rumors that Hillary and Obama secretly attended together on 6/6/08 (the night before she conceded), which is allegedly a violation of the Logan Act. Also, allegedly at this meeting, the Bilderberg Group decided Obama would be crowned in 2008 and Hillary would be crowned in 2016. Hillary conceded on 6/7 (the following morning).

    And Hillary supposedly attended again in 2009. (she denies this, but there are photographs online)

    Bill attended in 1991, which he initially denied and later admitted.

    Anyway, it’s all very New World Order-ish. But there is so much talk, it has piqued my interest.

  • tamarque

    Am quite surprised to see some of the names in the outer circle, like MOVE ON.Org and Carol Mosely Braun. Are we seeing infiltration or co-optation before our eyes!

    • Ron Kramer

      It’s been going on for a very long time, your favorite NGO’s and ‘independent’ news and information sources are often funded by the very international banking and corporate elites that they pretend to oppose. I have many articles that describe various aspects and details of this state of affairs, here’s one of them…

      Following The Money:
      Is the alternative press wire service compromised by secret foundation support?
      http://freepacifica.savegrassrootsradio.org/fp/follow~1.html
      .

  • Tonya Parnell

    I SAW BILL CLINTON’S NAME IN THERE. LINDSEY GRAHAM WAS ON THE LIST, THE ONLY SENATOR. WHAT IS HE DOING ON IT?

    • Ron Kramer

      Well, there’s this…

      http://thehill.com/policy/international/276836-graham-blocking-saudi-9-11-bill-over-fears-of-blowback
      Sen. Lindsey Graham has placed a hold on legislation that would open the door for victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks to sue Saudi Arabia.

      And this…

      NEOCON LINDSEY GRAHAM TO ATTEND BILDERBERG
      http://www.infowars.com/neocon-lindsey-graham-to-attend-bilderberg/

      Graham, who launched a failed presidential bid, said last March his first act as president would be to deploy the military in Washington to force Congress to reverse cuts to the defense and intelligence budgets.

      He is a fierce advocate of invading countries on the neocon hit list. In July 2013, Graham vowed to introduce legislation to authorize a military attack on Iran.
      Stop Trump at All Cost
      A regular Bilderberg attendee, Martin Wolf of the Financial Times, said in January the global elite must stop a Trump presidency.

  • David

    Quote “All information, data, and material
    contained, presented, or provided on TheFreeThoughtProject.com is for
    educational purposes only. It is not to be construed or intended as
    providing medical or legal advice. Any views expressed here-in are not
    necessarily those held by TheFreeThoughtProject.com
    Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/chart-exposes-bilderberg-group-controls-world/#2GMRYXf125JduoCr.99

    You talk about transparency and accountability whilst in the same breath denying any responsibility or accountability for what you post nor offer any transparency of what your views nor your position is within this framework.. If you expect others to act a certain way it would be both a good idea and useful for you yourself to act likewise.

  • tamarque

    Ron–do know that most NGO’s are shills for corporations. I was just surprised to see Move On.org listed.

    Tonya–why are you surprised to see Graham’s name listed?

    • Ron Kramer

      Move-on has received tens of millions of dollars from wealthy donors including billionaire George Soros, who has a history of working with the US state department and intelligence agency fronts like USAID to create unrest and ‘regime change’ in countries that do not cooperate sufficiently with the western banking elite, (represented by Bilderbergers) the most recent being Ukraine where the son of US Vice President Joe Biden now sits on the Board of Directors of Ukraines biggest energy company.

      Here’s an article that describes one aspect of how move-on operates…

      http://www.globalresearch.ca/how-progressives-and-the-american-left-are-failing-over-syria/5347734

      A notch lower on the leftist spectrum of Syria war guilt is MoveOn.org, which has done everything in their power not to portray President Obama’s actions in their true light. But MoveOn had to take a more creative approach to covering up for Obama in Syria.
      MoveOn organized a “teach-in” that was streamed on their website. The panel of speakers — with one exception — presented Obama’s position in a very evenhanded, “objective” way, presenting the president as an entirely reasonable person for wanting to bomb Syria, even if it might not be the best way to deal with the situation.
      Instead of pointing out the flagrant similarities between Obama’s Syria war rationale and George Bush’s Iraq War lies, these similarities were papered over, thus legitimizing Obama’s criminal actions.
      The worst Obama apologist on the panel was Matt Duss from the Center for American Progress, who explained that, although he was against a war on Syria, he “respects” that “other progressives of good faith may come to a different view.”
      Phyllis Bennis from the Institute of Policy Studies was the only consistent anti-war panelist, who appeared as a fringe element when compared to the rest of the panel, only because she offered a common sense, consistent anti-war message.
      The teach-in ended with a “what can we do” segment to influence the situation. Instead of mobilizing in the streets against Obama, the panelists discussed “contacting congressmen,” “calling the White House’s comment line,” “tweeting,” “email,” “petitions,” but no call was made for doing what was done against Bush: mobilize people in the streets to demand that the war be stopped.

  • cyber-commenter

    Boy Scouts of America? Makes me think this list just links any organization ever affiliated with a member. And a couple of people who have been dead for years are on it too. William F. Buckley for one. George Shultze I believe is also gone.

  • tamarque

    Ron–thanx for the Global Research article. I often read them myself and like their information as very direct and not timid.

    Tonya–They seem to have picked Obama before he was elected, and if memory serves, Clinton was also vetted at that time, too. My understanding is this group strategizes about who will run and vets them at their meetings. All our recent presidents have been to their meetings or been members of the group. I guess we need to watch Graham for his communications and his votes.

  • Tonya Parnell

    I was only surprised to see Graham there because he seems to be the only Congressman there out of all the dirt bags in Congress.

    • Ron Kramer

      The Bilderbergers are into world domination, a one world totalitarian government controlled by the western corporate/banking elite. They work through the left by (among other things) disarming the citizens of their respective countries and through taxes and regulations that serve the bigger corporate conglomerates while stifling competition and they work through the right (neocons) by propagandizing for endless wars and general imperialism around the world which benefit the corporate/banking elites at the expense of the common taxpayer who are forced to pay for an extremely bloated military spending budget.