Despite the overwhelming mass of scientific literature and studies showing the harmful effects of ingesting fluoride, those who question it or advocate for the cessation of fluoridated water are labeled as kooks, conspiracy theorists, and shouted down by the mainstream. Even when the mainstream admits it — as in the case of the highly publicized Harvard Study — people remain in denial about this most horrific practice of mass medication without consent using the poisonous byproduct of fertilizer production.

However, all that appears to be changing. For the first time in US history, the courts will hear the evidence on the neurotoxicity of fluoridated water which could out an end to this practice once and for all.

Thanks to the vigilant work of the folks at the Fluoride Action Network, who’ve refused for years to be silenced, we are now witnessing an unprecedented move to stop this practice. Thousands of pages of research put together by dozens of scientists and doctors has been included in a lawsuit that could end water fluoridation in the United States.

Simply put, the evidence has reached critical mass and even the government can’t deny it.

Fluoridation, Americans are told, is necessary for the prevention of tooth decay. We must drink it and we must give our children fluoridated water in order for everyone to have a healthy smile — or so we have been advised for the last 60 years.

A whopping 43 studies have linked fluoride ingestion with a reduction in IQ. A study out of the Harvard School of public Health concluded, “children in high-fluoride areas had significantly lower IQ scores than those who lived in low-fluoride areas.”


Even more independent studies have linked the associated health risks of fluoride to interfering with the endocrine system and increasing the risk of impaired brain function. Two studies in recent years, for example, have linked fluoridation to ADHD and underactive thyroid.

Dozens more studies show the ineffectiveness of fluoride ingestion in preventing dental caries; they actually show an increase in dental fluorosis instead of a reduction in decay.

Approximately 1.2 grams of sodium fluoride will kill an adult human being. That was the low estimate that Dominic Smith ingested when he died from an overdose of fluoridated water at Hooper Bay, Alaska on May 23, 1992. Approximately 200 mg will kill a small child.

READ MORE:  This Man is on Death Row For A Crime Most Likely Committed By A Convicted Rapist Cop

In spite of this evidence showing that the mass drugging of the American population is harmful, the CDC and the EPA maintain that it is 100% safe and that drinking the extremely deadly byproducts of fertilizer production is just fine and dandy.

It is because of the government’s continued denial and dismissal of scientific evidence that the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) has filed this landmark lawsuit.

FAN is not some ragtag group of conspiracy theorists sitting around in their basements reading fake science on the internet. The group is comprised of dozens of medical doctors, dentists, PhDs, and scientists, who’ve joined forces to bring an end to this most unethical and dangerous practice.

Stuart Cooper, FAN’s Campaign Director issued an open letter this week, noting how the “Fluoride Action Network (FAN), along with a coalition of environmental and public health groups has filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in response to their denial of our petition under Section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) seeking a ban on water fluoridation.

“We believe this lawsuit is an unprecedented opportunity to end the practice once and for all in the U.S., and potentially throughout the world, based on the well-documented neurotoxicity of fluoride.” You may read the official complaint here. According to FAN’s attorney and adviser, Michael Connett:

“This case will present the first time a court will consider the neurotoxicity of fluoride and the question of whether fluoridation presents an unreasonable risk under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).

And, in contrast to most other legal challenges of Agency actions, TSCA gives us the right to get the federal court to consider our evidence ‘de novo’ — meaning federal courts are to conduct their own independent review of the evidence without deference to the EPA’s judgment.”

According to FAN, the reason for the lawsuit was due to the fact that the EPA dismissed their massive cache of information submitted to them, via petition, last year.

On November 22, 2016, a coalition including FAN, Food & Water Watch, Organic Consumers Association, American Academy of Environmental Medicine, International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology, Moms Against Fluoridation and several individual mothers, filed a petition calling on the EPA to ban the deliberate addition of fluoridating chemicals to the drinking water under provisions in the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).


The petition includes more than 2,500 pages of scientific documentation detailing the risks of water fluoridation to human health.


We presented the FDA with a large body of human and animal evidence demonstrating that fluoride is a neurotoxin at levels now ingested by many U.S. children and vulnerable populations. We also presented the agency with evidence showing that fluoride has little benefit when swallowed and, accordingly, any risks from exposing people to fluoride chemicals in water are unnecessary.

Despite this petition, the EPA, who illustrates through this move and many others that it is beholden to special interests only and not the people, denied it.

READ MORE:  5 Critical Stories the Mainstream Media Buried Under Charlie Sheen's Personal Life

There is now a significant consensus happening in the scientific community noting that fluoride is, indeed, neurotoxic. For the EPA to dismiss scientific facts is not only irresponsible but it is now proving to be criminal.

The question now is not if fluoride damages the brain — it is at what dose does fluoride damage the brain.

According to FAN, EPA’s own Guidelines for Neurotoxicity Risk Assessment highlights the importance of having a robust margin between the doses of a chemical that cause neurotoxic effects and the doses that humans receive. FAN presented the EPA with over 180 studies showing that fluoride causes neurotoxic harm (e.g., reduced IQ), pointing out that many of these studies found harm at levels within the range, or precariously close to, the levels millions of American children now receive.

Since the petition was submitted to the EPA in November and subsequently denied, more damning evidence has surfaced in the case against fluoride — and, this time, it’s from the EPA’s own scientist.

As FAN reports, some children in the U.S. may be consuming enough fluoridated water to reach doses of fluoride that have the potential to lower their IQ, according to a research team headed by William Hirzy, Ph.D., a former senior scientist at the EPA who specialized in risk assessment and published an important risk analysis in the journal Fluoride last year.

Hirzy explains the significance of this study:

“The significance of this peer reviewed risk analysis is that it indicates there may be no actual safe level of exposure to fluoride. Groups of children with lower exposures to fluoride were compared with groups having higher exposures. Those with higher exposures performed more poorly on IQ tests than those with lower exposures.


One well-conducted Chinese study indicated that children exposed to 1.4 mg/day had their IQ lowered by 5 IQ points. Current average mean daily intakes among children in the United States are estimated by EPA to range from about 0.80 mg/day to 1.65 mg/day. Fluoride may be similar to lead and mercury in having no threshold below which exposures may be considered safe.”

The fight against fluoride across the globe is winning. According to FAN, millions of citizens in hundreds of municipalities throughout the world have forced their governments to stop drugging them without consent using this toxic waste. This action is working and the lawsuit is proof of its effectiveness.

READ MORE:  Ecuadorian Natives Detain Govt Troops as State Attempts to Give Their Land Away to Big Oil

For those who’d like to support the Fluoride Action Network or would like to know how you can get involved, there are some tips below. Please share this article with your friends and family to let them know that we the people are finally making progress when it comes to our health and the health of our children.


Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project. Follow @MattAgorist on Twitter, Steemit, and now on Facebook.
  • Seabreezes1

    Amen. However, this lawsuit is only about the evidence of neurotoxicity in the context of TSCA regulations. Fluoride has many more ill effects. Fluoridation will cause or worsen symptoms for many, most or all with inflammatory conditions, kidney disease, thyroid disorders, and immune system dysfunction.

    Give this 2016 letter to your politicians: http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/brockovich-2016.pdf
    Give this 2016 letter to your doctors: http://www.ehcd.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2016_02_11_ATALtrCWF.pdf


    The F.D.A should stick to drug research and get out of the drug war business. The little” valid research they manage to accomplish is far overshadowed by their complication in the war on marijuanaand and drugs.The F.D.A. is very obsolete, of negative value and in desperate need of systemwide reform. Ninety percent of drug addicted people are so because of an act of Civil disobedience..No wonder Authoritarian tyrants in government would make war on them, and us..If the D.E.A. and F.D.A would go away so would then drug problem.

    • Dan Quixoté

      This is Why the FDA Shouldn’t Regulate Anything…

    • WeAreYourGods

      Indeed the FDA is only an enabler and protector of the corporate demons who in this case, would rather poison Americans than spend some extra money to dispose of their waste. Whether it’s drugs, chemicals, or waste in our food and water, they are a corporate rubber stamp.

  • alexandra

    Its just not the fluoride, its also the high estrogen birth control pills and the opiods being urinated out and flushed into the water systems. Guess what they are still in ur tap water.. don’t waste ur time with bottle water just another $ racket get purifiers.

    • Dan Quixoté

      This is why I run all our drinking and cooking water through a twin Berkey with the extra PF-2 ion exchange cartridges, since we don’t have well water anymore. Can’t be drinking all that garbage – it’s no good for anything in the animal kingdom.

  • sab1053

    Chlorine in water whether in the form of free chlorine or chloramine is deadly as well. During the Korean war, soldiers were given chlorine tablets to sterilize water to make it drinkable. After numerous autopsies on young soldiers were performed after they were killed in action, an astonishing Discovery was noted. These young soldiers still in their twenties had severe cases of atherosclerosis. The common factor… Chlorine. But there were countless studies to corroborate this discovery.

  • Dan Quixoté

    The disturbing history of how the US government originated water fluoridation because of the Manhattan Project…

    “Fluorides, the atomic bomb, and a scientist spy” https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/04/27/fluorides-the-atomic-bomb-and-a-spy-2/

  • John C Carleton

    Thats why the US government has forced this poison on the people, that want dumb Americans, so dumb they will believe the bald faced lies Washington DC spews out each and every time one of the whores of Babylon opens their pie hole.

  • WeAreYourGods

    We already avoid drinking tap water due to the lead and fluoride, but fluoride is in almost every bottled water and juice on the market as well. Hopefully this could lead to a fluoride ban, but I doubt the industries that cooked up this scheme (namely the aluminum manufacturing industry and their avoidance of proper toxic waste disposal) will go without a fight. Interesting that Fluoride is banned in drinking water basically all developed nations, including China. China actually disposes of it’s sodium fluoride by selling to the the US, where we incomprehensibly add it to our water!

  • paulthecabdriver

    Fluoride is also one of the key ingredients in many psychotropic meds, such as Prozac. It tends to keep people calmed down. So, I can just picture what can happen if this lawsuit goes through, and the government is forced to stop fluoridating the water. The entire population of the country will suddenly start acting like they are “off their meds”. Oh goody.

  • Amanda Stockham

    Yay!!! This is wonderful news!