Omran

Covered in dust and bruises with hair disheveled from having survived a blast, the blood beginning to crust over half his face, a seeming placidity — hands anchored on his legs, all-but unmoving — could not mask the stoic trauma in little Omran Daqneesh’s eyes.

Gazing hauntingly from the back of an ambulance in Aleppo in August 2016, Omran’s image snared the heartstrings of the world — even those previously hardened to the hopelessly tangled morass in Syria — transmogrifying into a single human form the suffering of innocent Syrians at the whims of entire nation-states embroiled in proxy war upon war in the name of political squabbles.

But, while the West took up Omran’s cause, Westerners did so under the pretense the child had been bloodied by an airstrike or missile launched by the forces of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad or their allies from Russia — his image rekindling the fire of contention propaganda designed to support the United States’ goal of regime change.

But it was a lie — from mass media’s parroted claims the boy had escaped an airstrike within an inch of his life, to bandages eventually wrapped around Omran’s head — virtually none of the narrative stemming from the starkly persistent image bore the weight of truth.

“We did not find out how the incident happened,” Mohamad Kheir Daqneesh, Omran’s father, told reporter Kinana Alloush and others in interviews this week. “I pulled my family members out of debris. Omran was with me, while White Helmets took him away and started taking photo of him.”

Daqneesh, noting the sound of fighter jets or missiles did not precede the blast which ultimately killed Omran’s 10-year-old brother, explained he had to shave the boy’s head and ferret him away from overwhelming media attention — and from rebel fighters and sympathizers who sought perhaps to wrest the symbolic child from the relative safety of his family.

READ MORE:  Internal Communications Show Syrian War Is a Lie, Russia Could Crush US Military

Journalists allied with al-Nusra Front — variously, Fatah al-Sham or Levant Liberation, an offshoot of al-Qaeda — demanded the father adhere to the narrative Assad was responsible for Russians bombing the neighborhood, and, thus, their suffering and tragic predicament. They even offered sizable sums to sweeten the pot.

Advertisment

He refused — on principle, as well as on the basis of knowledge likely some contrary was true.

In fact, the attempt to wrangle a narrative favorable to the U.S.-led coalition hasn’t ceased — even amid the emergence of the family’s actual plight, pro-Western media outlets like the Guardian and Washington Post maintained speculation and withheld details disputing the original maudlin horror evinced in the August 17, 2016, image of Omran in the ambulance’s orange chair.

Where Alloush and other journalists, interviewing Daqneesh with Omran by his side — now clean cut and hinting smiles — listened intently to the man fed up with misinformation circulating for almost a year, Western corporate media insisted there could be no way to verify whether coercion forced him to speak out.

Mohamad — gasp — supports the rule of Assad.

But where eagerness to paint the Syrian war in the broad strokes of good versus evil might have fabricated the story to the benefit of shared goals possessed by the West and barbarous militants, reality is never so simple.

Nor is it so verily sterile and concrete, even when tinged with hollow tears from a world audience eager to pin blame and continue dropping bombs as usual.

War’s messes cannot be encapsulated so facilely in the resigned, dusty face of a single child — not when thousands of children whose stability, limbs, life, and homeland have been ripped to shreds — but go unnoticed by the same corporate media backing interventionist policy wreaking that havoc in the first place.

Omran, it turns out, suffered only minor injuries — not even severe enough to warrant head bandages, much less a footnote in history as the poster child for why the West must oust Assad — and he left the hospital after receiving first aid to return to whatever remained of their home in Aleppo.

“He only sustained minor injuries, but the militants exaggerated this fact. They said on numerous occasions via their media that he died, until finally admitting that he’s alive. They are not to be trusted,” the elder Daqneesh asserted.

“While I was rescuing my family the militants filmed my kin getting out of the house, in order to use these images for propaganda … I never had any dealings with their organizations and I never accepted their so-called humanitarian aid.”

Months of hiding, dodging further unwanted attention, plagued Daqneesh — until ire at brazen manipulation of his son boiled over into statements with journalists clarifying Assad and the Russians should not bear blame.

Terrorists — some armed, trained, backed, and laughably reclassified by the West and its allies as ‘moderate rebels’ — still aim to depose Assad and dominate Syria. In some places, they do.

And while it would be equally as farcical to sterilize atrocities committed by Syrian and Russian forces, denying Western and American complicity in the horrors besieging civilians belies a pomposity in politicized warring — with children like Omran unknowingly symbolizing two fundamentally differing justifications for its continuance.

Omran isn’t Syria. But because he is Syrian, the ugliness of conflict in the Middle East — stoked by a laundry list of geopolitical, religious, and other conniving agendas — found shameless solace in emblazoning his image on propaganda conveniently supporting each, individually.

And shamelessly so.

If Omran Daqneesh is to be a poster child of this war, then let the five-year-old grace only posters calling for its end — for a return to a life Westerners might not be familiar in its normalcy, but which suited the majority of Syrians.

Until, that is, the time the otherwise insular conflict took on proxy outgrowths and began using traumatized children as pawns.

If you wish only to never see another Omran — less so, his counterparts, who were fortunate enough to escape the additional burden of  the international floodlight, but who suffered worse fates — then war must end. Troops must be delivered back to their families. Death must cease to be a commodification of the need to intervene in affairs of sovereign nations.

Diplomacy, even that not fully in sync with either warring party, must return as a viable alternative to the murder writ large in pro-war arrogance and propaganda.

Otherwise, there will be more Omrans — worse, there will be an interminable list of children lost to war, whose names and faces only their families will mourn.

That, not a situation manipulated to appear as something more, is the true horror of war.

SHARE
Claire Bernish began writing as an independent, investigative journalist in 2015, with works published and republished around the world. Not one to hold back, Claire’s particular areas of interest include U.S. foreign policy, analysis of international affairs, and everything pertaining to transparency and thwarting censorship. To keep up with the latest uncensored news, follow her on Facebook or Twitter: @Subversive_Pen.
  • Gordon Klock

    I hate to admit, I was stupid enough, to get conned into sending them a donation, before discovering what they were really about…(& I’m usually fairly good, at spotting these types of evil, political, fabrications)………

  • What’s Aleppo?

    • Damiana

      Just fancy dog food – go back to sleep!

  • LightLight

    The source for this article (which is where the video comes from at the bottom of the article) is Sputnik, a Russian government news agency. Hardly a standard of journalism worth trusting. If you speak Arabic, watch the video at the end of the article. Twice Sputnik translates “they” (or “those people”) when the father is talking as “the insurgents” in the English subtitles – which is not what he says. Equally, while the father says that “they” took Omran to the hospital to film him afterwards, the father does not say “for the sake of propaganda” which Sputnik has put in the English subtitles. You guys are idiots.

    • Glasheengal

      “Hardly a standard of journalism worth trusting” As opposed to the Daily Mail or the WaPo of NYT ?

    • pookieamos

      You are the idiot disregarding the truth about the White Helmets because of Russia?

      • MichaelTheRed

        NO dipshit, u are the idiot because you dont grasp the fact the previous poster actually speaks arabic and is claiming the russian translation is differrnt than what the syrian father is actually saying

    • junktex

      Biggest liars in existence are in DC/Brussels and TelAviv

  • Guy

    As usual the truth comes out eventually .Enough false videos already .If one makes the inquiries with an open mind , to find truth ,it is usually not hard to find .
    Regime change was what it was all about , just like they did in Iraq , Libya and now attempted to do in Syria .The real perpetrators are right here in the West .How many more wars for the military industrial complex and wall street gamblers . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RC1Mepk_Sw

  • CM McGoldrick

    So, whoever the writer of the article is, lost my interest in the article about half way through the third paragraph. Get to the point…quit rambling on. You could’ve completed this article with about half of what you wrote. I do not know who you are trying to impress or which man-bun toting, skinny jean wearing starbucks drinking tool you’re trying so desparately to win a date with…but shit, you will never get a job with any major outlet writing novels about a simple story. I’m legitimately angry that it took you so much time to write about two main points. I appreciate your need to captivate an audience, but you’re not writing a book. You’re not writing a passion novel. You’re writing an online article that not very many people are going to see. And now I am even more upset with you because I should not have to be spending time commenting on how upset I am that you wrote this the way you did. And the word choice…come on now. Really Claire? Really?!?!? Do you really believe someone that is not very educated (but is thoroughly interested in articles involving political agenda and wants to stay up on current events) is going to keep reading your novel after they see words like “facilely” and “insular”? Come on Claire…you’re better than this “I’m a journalist because I believe it’s an artform” bullshit. You should rewrite this article. Make sure you run it by your editor next time, so the rest of the world that may not be as smart as you and others, can stay current with current events. You could’ve covered 3 separate storied articles on this site, had you thought twice about trying to impress everyone with your highly educated vacobulary. You’re trying to hard. Stop it.