Home / Government Surveillance / US Govt Just Legalized Operation Mockingbird — FBI Can Now Impersonate the Media

US Govt Just Legalized Operation Mockingbird — FBI Can Now Impersonate the Media

media

FBI agents conducting undercover investigations have now been given the green light to impersonate journalists, the Justice Department determined last week — effectively legalizing the government’s most notorious propaganda program, Operation Mockingbird.

Last Thursday, the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General published what’s become the subject of outrage for journalists, civil and constitutional rights advocates, and legal experts  — “A Review of the FBI’s Impersonation of a Journalist in a Criminal Investigation.”

Allowing agents to infiltrate media organizations for any reason threatens to utterly undermine public trust, kill the very concept of journalistic integrity, and throttle the flow of information from sources and whistleblowers concerned with the legitimacy of journalists they contact.

As shocking as the finding sounds, it only validates the practice — in fact, the report centers around a case from 2007 in which an FBI agent pretended to be an Associated Press journalist to identify an elusive suspect online. At the time, the FBI “did not prohibit agents from impersonating journalists or from posing as a member of a news organization,” the report states.

But even the ubiquitous, mainstream AP — whose outlet became an unwitting pawn for the agency — sharply criticized the DOJ’s announcement.

“The Associated Press is deeply disappointed by the Inspector General’s findings, which effectively condone the FBI’s impersonation of an AP journalist in 2007,” Associated Press Vice President Paul Colford said in a statement cited by US News. “Such action compromises the ability of a free press to gather the news safely and effectively and raises serious constitutional concerns.”

In 2007, a high school student near Seattle emailed a series of bomb threats to his school, but his use of proxy servers thwarted police efforts to learn his identity — so they asked for assistance from the FBI’s Northwest Cybercrime Task Force.

Agents devised a plan, and, as the Intercept summarized, “An undercover agent sent the student email impersonating an editor for the Associated Press. The email included links to a fake news site designed to look like the Seattle Times.”

When the student followed the links, malware revealing his actual location installed itself.

It wasn’t until an ACLU technologist accidentally discovered copies of the bogus news stories in 2014 — buried in pages the Electronic Frontier Foundation obtained from the FBI via a Freedom of Information Act request in 2011 — that the plot to pose as journalists came to light, generating massive controversy and consternation.

Furthering the contempt, FBI Director James Comey penned a letter to the editor of the New York Times defending the agency’s impersonation, dismissively stating “we do use deception at times to catch crooks, but we are acting responsibly and legally.”

READ MORE:  Feds Recognize Power of Pot, Approve Bill Allowing Vets Access to Medical Marijuana

The Associated Press and Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press didn’t believe either the veracity or legality of Comey’s statement, and sued the FBI to disclose documents relating to the practice — ultimately obtaining a redacted memo in which the agency acknowledged the agents violated the FBI’s own guidelines. However, the memo also stated that violation, under the circumstances, was not “unreasonable.”

A review was launched by the OIG, but Thursday’s conclusion simply confirmed the FBI’s previous finding it had done nothing wrong — and may proceed with future journalistic deception.

In June this year, the FBI firmed up its rules for when an agent can pretend to be a journalist — but the added rules haven’t quelled the ire.

As long as agents receive approval from the head of the FBI field office, the Undercover Review Committee, and the deputy director of the FBI — who then must meet with the deputy attorney general — they are free to pose as journalists during undercover investigations.

“We believe the new interim policy on undercover activities that involve FBI employees posing as members of the news media is a significant improvement to FBI policies that existed,” states the inspector general.

But no one outside the FBI or DOJ’s Office of Inspector General who grasps the grievous threat to free speech and press — or the potential slippery slope law enforcement co-opting the media represents — agrees anything short of an abolishment on the practice could be acceptable.

“The FBI guidelines adopted in 2016 in response to this incident still permit the FBI to impersonate news organizations and other third parties without their consent in certain cases, and fail to address the host of other dangers associated with FBI hacking,” Neema Singh Guliani, ACLU legislative counsel, said in a statement cited by US News.

“The Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press is deeply troubled by today’s disclosure,” David Boardman, RCFP steering committee chairman, wrote in a statement last Thursday, “that the FBI believes that there is a place in this country for federal agents to impersonate journalists. Such a policy can seriously damage the public’s trust in its free press and the ability of journalists to hold government accountable. We urge the Justice Department to take seriously the need for reform and the importance of protecting the integrity of the newsgathering process.”

Anyone with cursory knowledge of the U.S. government’s nefarious programs to control its citizenry will undoubtedly see similarities between the FBI’s fake journalism plot and the post-World War II CIA propaganda campaign, Operation Mockingbird.

To ensure support for its operations and views, the CIA clandestinely recruited American journalists and media outlets, funded the creation of student and cultural organizations, launched purely propaganda-based print media, and, ultimately, worked its way into political campaigns and employed similar methods abroad.

Mainstream outlets like the New York Times, the Washington Post, CBS, and many others, actively and willingly disseminated propaganda disguised as news — through suppression, censorship, and selective focus, etc. — in the interest of the government.

Mockingbird covertly influenced national opinion for years, nefariously planting the CIA’s narrative on the unwitting collective public mind before finally being at least partially exposed over a decade later. It wasn’t until a congressional investigation in 1975 the putative full extent of the program was revealed. Although the CIA claimed it would no longer recruit journalists and media organizations into its folds, Mockingbird has oft been rumored never to have stopped.

Besides the revelations in this article concerning the FBI, documents revealed the government actively tried to influence public thought about Wikileaks and its founder, Julian Assange, in 2011.

It would seem Mockingbird endures to this day — and whatever premise the government claims as reason to become the American media — the public remains, for the large part, its oblivious, captive audience.

  • Phil Freeman

    Welcome to the new world order.

    • This quote and link will make it clear as day for you and others. “Who controls the issuance of money controls the government!” Nathan Meyer Rothschild

      June 13, 2016 Which Corporations Control The World?

      A surprisingly small number of corporations control massive global market shares. How many of the brands below do you use?

      http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44864.htm

    • The fact of influence is not synonymous with any reality of control.

      Just because they might get you to take a step in the wrong direction, or manipulate a view for a moment, does not mean control over where you end up. Unless you just don’t have a clue, in which case … all that media influence stuff might be a really big deal …

  • July 15, 2016 Gestapo America

    FBI Director James Comey got Hillary off the hook but wants to put you on it. He is pushing hard for warrantless access to all of your Internet activity. Comey, who would have fit in perfectly with Hitler’s Gestapo, tells Congress that the United States is not safe unless the FBI knows when every American goes online, to whom they are sending emails and from whom they are receiving emails, and knows every website visited by every American.

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45107.htm

  • The CIA has been the media as we know it. Here is a flashback for folks. 9/23/1975 Tom Charles Huston Church Committee Testimony

    Tom Charles Huston testified before the Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, commonly known as the Church Committee, on the 43-page plan he presented to the President Nixon and others on ways to collect information about anti-war and “radical” groups, including burglary, electronic surveillance, and opening of mail.

    https://www.c-span.org/video/?408953-1/tom-charles-huston-testimony-church-committee

  • Mod8guy

    I suppose someone should impersonate police or any fed alphabet soup agency to catch the corrupt majority of government scum. One good turn deserves another.

  • Duke-Jinx

    …and We were mostly worried about the 2nd amendment

    • What’s the good of a 2nd amendment if there is no 4th, for practical purposes. Because if there’s no 4th, for practical purposes, then there is no 1st to actualize the 2nd.

      There’s gotta be a way around this quandry that doesn’t involve ripping everything down and starting all over again.

      • Duke-Jinx

        Let there be No question… The 2nd is the Teeth, of All other amendments and Rights contained in Our Constitution.

        • Right, and lets see how pervasive the monitoring is on you by the time you’ve organized with more than a very small handful of fellow gun owners.

          And anyways, the modern interpretation isn’t very related to the practical value of local militias in terms of upholding independence and freedom at the time the constitution was written.

          If you cannot communicate without the state spying on you, then what good is the 2nd amendment for the purposes you suggest? Aside from the ability of certain arms of the state to goad you into violent actions that will justify their existence or possibly even further budget expansions …

  • OvidiuGOA

    Land of the lies

  • MarvLS1

    No matter, I don’t pay attention to the media anyway.

    • Lin Lee

      Where do you get your news then? Twitter?

  • Nick K. Aghazarian

    Guess it’s only fair then for media to pretend to be law enforcement…

  • stellar1

    When did they ever have Trust??? They’re All a Den of thieves,Murderers,Corrupt sociopaths…

  • dujaa74

    “Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal.” – Martin Luther King, Jr

  • rashard4

    “Mainstream outlets like the New York Times, the Washington Post, CBS, and many others, actively and willingly disseminated propaganda disguised as news — through suppression, censorship, and selective focus, etc. — in the interest of the government.”

    Telling isn’t it.

  • djnforce9

    So it’s ok for the FBI to lie and impersonate the media but if anyone dressed up as an FBI agent to uproot corruption, they still go to jail. Glad I don’t live in the US; seems that’s where the worst legislation is born. Just look at all their bogus copyright laws which invade the entire world.

  • CapedBaldy

    “Russian Hackers”

  • R Stone

    Time for many of us to create our own small media and just push out the news every where in every way. Get out truth.

  • Jeffrey Gee

    Operation Mockingbird and the CIA (Cunts Idiots and Assholes) has been going on for decades. Congress just passed a bill allowing the news and individuals to be censored. CNN, NPR, NBC, ABC, FOX, Bloomberg, The NY Times/Post, Washington Times/Post evidently want to shut down everything that isn’t them and control the narrative. The only thing most of these corporate/government/globalist run media conglomerates are good for is too read between the lines and find out what their true angle/story is. I make fun of this shit all day long, sorry to some of you that already know the deal and it must seem repetitive until the global population is very aware of the BS peddled to us on a daily basis it is your/my duty to help inform people of reality!

  • AK_User

    “Allowing agents to infiltrate media organizations for any reason threatens to utterly undermine public trust, kill the very concept of journalistic integrity…”

    Now THAT is funny! Pretending that journalism in the US had any integrity left. The media is just upset because they no longer have a monopoly on the nation’s propaganda. It isn’t as if anyone believed them in the first place.

  • lyncher

    What a surprise!!!!!