Home / Be The Change / Precedent Set — Germany to Fine Facebook $500K for Every ‘Fake News’ Post they Don’t Delete

Precedent Set — Germany to Fine Facebook $500K for Every ‘Fake News’ Post they Don’t Delete

facebook

Germany — Germany now says if Facebook refuses to deal with “fake news” in a timely manner, it will fine the social media platform €500,000 (around $525,000) for each false or hate speech item it fails to remove within 24 hours.

Thomas Oppermann, chairman of Germany’s Social Democratic Party, suggests a strict law with concurrent stiff penalty might be the best method of combating the plethora of “fake news” now apparently flooding the interwebs.

“Facebook did not avail itself of the opportunity to regulate the issue of complaint management itself,” Oppermann told Der Spiegel in an interview Friday. “Now market dominating platforms like Facebook will be legally required to build a legal protection office in Germany that is available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.”

According to Deutsche Welle, this would allow putative ‘victims’ of fake news or hate speech to contact Facebook and request action be taken.

“If, after appropriate examination, Facebook does not delete the offending message within 24 hours,” Oppermann continued, “it should expect individual fines of up to 500,000 euros ($523,320).”

Germany’s announcement comes on the heels of Facebook’s formally announcing its newest plan to deal with the same “fake news” issue — the company will partner with adamantly left-leaning organizations Snopes, Politifact, FactCheck.org, the Associated Press, and ABC News to vet and label items “disputed.” Corporate media largely lauded that announcement, ignoring entirely the distinct potentiality for the effort to amount to blatant censorship of all ideas not in lock step with the neoliberal establishment.

All of this, despite Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg declaring shortly after the U.S. presidential election,

“Of all the content on Facebook, more than 99 percent of what people see is authentic. Only a very small amount is fake news and hoaxes. The hoaxes that do exist are not limited to one partisan view, or even to politics. Overall, this makes it extremely unlikely hoaxes changed the outcome of this election in one direction or the other.”

READ MORE:  How Facebook Censorship Actively Hides Evidence of Police Brutality

Zuckerberg and Facebook quickly changed their tune when it became clear the Democrat establishment wished to target alternative, independent, and right-leaning media organizations to shoulder the blame of its own shortcomings in the election of Donald Trump to the presidency.

While corporate media presstitutes praised fealty to Hillary Clinton, alternative outlets reported on the contents of documents leaked to Wikileaks concerning the former secretary of state — including collusion by those same ‘reporters’ with Clinton’s campaign.

Indeed, though analysts first decried the idea ‘fake news’ or misinformation swayed the election in favor of Donald Trump, hysteria amongst Clintonites and NeverTrump Republicans spread like wildfire online as the volatile situation in the United States threatened to explode into outright conflict. Now, a growing number of Electoral College electors from both sides of the aisle have declared they will not vote — or cast their votes for Trump — until an investigation into Russian election interference can be performed.

Russian hackers and pro-Russia propaganda constitutes the twin, parallel ‘problem’ having befallen the U.S. — unnamed officials in the CIA ostensibly found after an analysis that Russian actors hacked Democrat Party files and provided information to Wikileaks — but provided literally zero evidence to back up the slanderous claim.

Russian President Vladimir Putin — recently himself named by President Obama for involvement in the unproven hacks — has categorically denied Russia meddled in the election or hacked the DNC. Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, Judge Andrew Napolitano, and former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray have all — among many others — come forward to denounce the idea of Russian hackers as absurd and baseless.

“Our source is not the Russian government,” Assange told Sean Hannity in an interview, in which the Wikileaks founder discussed the inanity of claims Russia had influenced the U.S. election.

Assange elaborated that although his organization prefers to proffer no qualifying details about individuals who provide documents, he felt obligated to set the record straight in this case, so “we’ve had to come out and say, ‘no, it’s not a State party, stop trying to distract in that way, and pay attention to the content of the publications.”

“So, in other words, when you say State party, it wasn’t another State — like Russia, or some other country?” Hannity asked.

“Correct,” Assange replied.

Nevertheless, iterations of foreign influence in elections — whether via hacking, propaganda, or fake news — rattled Germany’s nerves sufficiently to take such staunch measures against Facebook.

In fact, censorship according to government standards is business-as-usual for the social media behemoth, and Facebook has worked with independent media organizations in Germany to remove offensive content and hate speech for some time. But the country’s plot to impose stiff fines on Facebook for disseminating fake news represents a dangerous and slippery slope for users in Europe as ‘fake news’ is often a matter of opinion.

But it isn’t without basis. Germany is effectively looking to the U.S. for methods to avert a crisis with its coming elections — viewing the putative Trump fiasco as a prime motivator for combating disinformation ahead of time, as it is widely believed the credible reporting by American independent media on corruption by the Dems helped hand Trump the presidency.

As Quartz reports, “The move is partly in response to fears that fake news posts could have an affect on the German parliamentary elections taking place in 2017, according to the Financial Times. Facebook has repeatedly said since the Nov. 8 election of Donald Trump in the US that fake news on its site, which has roughly 180 million users in the US and Canada, could not have affected the election.”

Although ‘fake news’ is generally viewed as a problematic issue which needs to be dealt with, the more liberty-minded have cautioned vociferously that even light censorship of ideas will cascade into widespread editing of thought.

If given an inch, those in power prefer to take miles — and it would seem Facebook, the U.S., and Germany have started down that lengthy, perilous road.

  • happy riches

    1984 might be a little late in arriving but the Ministry of Truth will see to it that it does and it will be back to the future with vassals pledging loyalty to Big Brother.

  • Ayax Gudziol

    First step into dictatorship: Censorship.

  • Sid Samsara

    Good luck Germany this seems well thought out.

    What of other social media, web sites, news groups and such? How many bureaucrats, lawyers and monitors would it take to respond to the amount of complaints and false flags the internet can generate? What happens when something widely believed to be false turns out to be true; Are they liable for damages?

    Think of the fun when they go to fine major media for reporting false news as they sometimes do or get complaints such as “That kitten could not turn on a blender” or “Climate change is a hoax”. Are they going to fine the CIA as well for spreading unsubstantiated rumors of Russian government DNC and election hacks?

    Get over it domestic and international censors, most folks recognize fake news and realize it’s BS in short order the same way that most folks understand that supermarket tabloids headlining Brad Pitts alien baby are fake news.

    • A.B. Madyun

      Dangerous people like yourself should be whom they target.

  • JdL

    This is great news: in short order the government will fine Facebook for failing to delete a “fake” story that turns out on further investigation to be true, thus discrediting the government. Perfect.

  • The Cat’s Vagina

    Why is Facebook being singled out? Do these same draconian rules and deadlines apply to ALL social media and news outlets because if not, it’s going to look a lot like someone is discriminating against a platform they don’t like.

    • European≠Nationality/Ethnicity

      It actually say social media platforms with huge market shares like FB, so no FB isn’t being singled out.

      • The Cat’s Vagina

        Which other organizations will be affected by these rules? Saying “social media platforms with huge market shares” actually is singling out FB on the basis of its popularity.

        • European≠Nationality/Ethnicity

          IG? Snapchat? Youtube? Disqus??? lol Honestly, I don’t know. We’ll have to wait and see as at this point it’s just a suggestion. It’s not a law yet.
          I was just letting you know what the original quote says.

        • henrybowmanaz

          It’s delicious, absolutely delicious. The left is eating itself. When your enemy is making a huge mistake, try not to tell him.

    • WolfEmperor

      I totally agree. Why not focus on getting rid of fake news in the MSM?

    • TecumsehUnfaced

      The media manipulators are going step by step. I guess they figure that if they grab Facebook first, the rest will sink to their knees more quickly. Besides, Zuckerberg is a fascist at heart.

      • mike

        And he has the backing from soros, That is why they need to smack them down and take all the money they can from soros and you will see how fast he stops supporting facebook

        • TecumsehUnfaced

          And they get their whistles wet too!

  • European≠Nationality/Ethnicity

    “If, after appropriate examination, Facebook does not delete the offending message within 24 hours,” Oppermann continued, “it should expect individual fines of up to 500,000 euros ($523,320).”

    This is the most important point, isn’t it? I don’t care about all the other things surrounding this topic. I actually like the idea that you should be able to hit them up directly, provide proof that something is fake and get them to delete it and maybe even post a rebuttal IF it’s really some bs.

    The real question is, what is “appropriate examination”?
    And who is ultimately responsible to deem it fake or not?

    Those two things worry me the most

  • Doran Zeigler

    The first place they should start looking for fake news is main stream media. CNN, CBS, MSNBC, NY Times, Washington Post, Fox, etc., all of whom routinely report fake news — except that we call it propaganda and psy-ops.

  • jean boyd

    The establishment is willing to do anything to stop the flow of news specifically about pizza-gate. They are willing to start WWIII with Russia to keep people from spreading the truth about the DNC leaks about Podesta, Clinton, and Obama participating in pedophelia.

  • OneTwoFive

    Hey Bevis, he said facebook

  • Remove “parties” and “leanings” from the picture and what you have here is the Oligarchy (the few families that own all of your media) wanting to control the information, they do not want you to hear anything “alternative” to their MSM.

    If you want to cook a frog, you don’t throw it into a steaming pot, you put it in some comfortable water and slowly raise the temperature.

    Time to wake up people, they have been slowly eroding your freedoms since 2001, both “parties” and both “sides” are guilty, it is they (the top 1%) versus you (the 99%).

    Owned & Operated
    https://youtu.be/njSV5LtVmR4

  • TOPDOG1

    All governments, including the U.S. will use any means, dirty trick,lies and false charges in an attempt to control or discredit the press, and now,” especially” the internet.

  • henrybowmanaz

    So to combat the fake statist meme of “fake news,” the German statists are going to levy huge fines against the Facebook statists.

    I’ll supply the beer. Who’s making the popcorn?