Home / Be The Change / Government Corruption / Video Shows How Google Manipulates Searches to Help Hillary Win Election

Video Shows How Google Manipulates Searches to Help Hillary Win Election

The idea that corporate media, government, and large technology companies collaborate to create a false sense of reality in an effort to drive a specific elite chosen narrative has been the stuff of conspiracy legend for years. However, thanks to the Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server, the Freedom of Information Act, and WikiLeaks, the inner workings of how empire operates have been clearly put on display for the world to see.

In March, the Free Thought Project reported on the explosive emails revealing how the U.S. State Department and Google worked in concert to topple the government of elected Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in an attempt at forwarding U.S. geopolitical strategy.

Prior to that report, we revealed Clinton’s cozy relationship with Google and YouTube after an email chain exposed the internet giant bowing down to Clinton’s demand for censorship.

Now, in another bombshell revelation, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has backed up Clinton and Google’s relationship, claiming they are working together to promote the Democratic presidential candidate.

Assange appeared via video conference at a session of ‘End of the Monopoly: The Open Information Age’, part of the ‘New Era of Journalism: Farewell to Mainstream international media’ forum organized at the Rossiya Segodnya International Multimedia Press Center in Moscow.

“Google is directly engaged with Hillary Clinton’s campaign,” said Assange before going on to claim the technology giant used the US State Department on “a quid pro quo” basis.

Behavioral Psychologist Dr. Robert Epstein, who has pioneered research on how search engines affect elections and much more, explained to Lee Camp the effects of such a relationship and that “when one candidate is higher in search rankings ‒ that is, looks better than another candidate in search rankings ‒ that shifts a lot of votes to that candidate. And it’s not a tiny number. It’s a very, very big number of votes.”

READ MORE:  BREAKING: WikiLeaks' Vault 7 Shows How CIA Spies on Your TV, Phone, PC, Mac, and More

“Google is heavily integrated with Washington power, at personal level and at business level. Google, which has increasing control over the distribution channels,… is intensely allying itself with the US exceptionalism. It shows the will to use that at different levels. It will inevitably influence its audience,” said Assange.

He then added, “Google is an intensely Washington, DC-aligned company. I see a Google exit from China… It seems much more to do with Google’s feeling that it is part of ‘family America’ and that it is opposed to the Chinese.”

Shortly after the WikiLeaks revelation, the group SourceFed actually found evidence that Google may be manipulating autocomplete recommendations in favor of Hillary Clinton. As SourceFed explains:

If true, this would mean that Google Searches aren’t objectively reflecting what the majority of Internet searches are actually looking for, possibly violating Google’s algorithm. According to a research paper cited in this video, that kind of search result manipulation has the potential to substantially influence the outcome of actual elections.

Below is the very powerful video explaining this connection.

Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world.

  • alvee, r

    damn, everyone’s pushing the hillary crapp on the public, Ap declaring her a winner before November, msnbc Chris Mathews saying they will report her as a winner regardless of the actual numbers, fml but im still not voting for someone who voted to help me become a disabled war veteran and then called it a money making opportunity #Bernieorbust


    just,… WOW. The shenanigans are Endless.

    • john robel

      Follow the trail of dead people from Little Rock. Larry Nichols knows all about it.

  • Unapologetically Me

    “to suggest Clinton was aware would be irresponsible” that is the only part I disagree with. It is OBVIOUS that she was aware, and it is irresponsible NOT to suggest so.

  • tamajam10

    Personally, I still cannot fathom why she is not rotting in jail.

  • Maurice Dutton

    You know the write up is about Clinton partly but the other part is about Google smudging the facts and Google will be around long after Hillary has gone. I have a well respected researcher in his field in Britain named David Nutt. Before you laugh at his name beware that he has had his internet censored so he cannot post words about psychedelics. This is besides the point he probably is one of the most eminent researchers in drugs and drug culture in Great Britain. Same goes for me in Australia with my microsoft uni email server where any drug word is making my messages and papers unopened and un readable. Its censorship and its unethical, immoral and just wrong. Whats next

  • Brian King

    Hillary was selected not elected

  • aggiefather

    Hillary’s obsession with controlling information (“Travelgate,” the Rose Law Firm missing documents, and “Filegate” for starters) combined with Eric Schmidt and Google’s unequaled access to the everyone’s personal information, make this combination a force to be reckoned with. She has obviously used ‘secret information’ about top people in the government to “leverage” her way out of every criminal act in which she has engaged. (Talk about “wickedness in high places.”) Her day of reckoning can’t come soon enough.