Home / Be The Change / WikiLeaks Operative Exposes Democrat Insiders as Source for Hacked DNC Docs — NOT RUSSIA

WikiLeaks Operative Exposes Democrat Insiders as Source for Hacked DNC Docs — NOT RUSSIA

In what could only be described as a smashing development, a WikiLeaks insider now claims the hacked release of documents evincing massive corruption in the Democrat Party and collusion by corporate media presstitutes had nothing at all to do with Russia — but was, instead, the handiwork of disillusioned Democrat insiders.

Craig Murray, who served as British Ambassador to Uzbekistan from 2002 through 2004 — and is now a known ally and associate of Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange — told the Daily Mail, “Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians. The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.”

Murray’s claims — given the current Red Scare atmosphere proffered by a hysterical neoliberal establishment — blow the roof off claims Russia undertook a steadied and insidious campaign to throw the United States’ presidential election in favor of hotly contentious candidate, Donald Trump.

Indeed, the former ambassador says the leaks were the work of a Washington, D.C., insider and had nothing at all to do with Russia, as the Democrats have so vociferously proclaimed.

Murray has even decried the lack of coverage of his allegations — unsurprisingly ignored by corporate media presstitutes proven in the leaks to have colluded with Hillary Clinton’s campaign — in a blog post explaining the utter lack of Russian connection to the hacks. As Murray penned:

“A little simple logic demolishes the CIA’s claims. The CIA claim they ‘know the individuals’ involved. Yet under Obama the USA has been absolutely ruthless in its persecution of whistleblowers, and its pursuit of foreign hackers through extradition. We are supposed to believe that in the most vital instance imaginable, an attempt by a foreign power to destabilise a US election, even though the CIA knows who the individuals are, nobody is going to be arrested or extradited, or (if in Russia) made subject to yet more banking and other restrictions against Russian individuals? Plainly it stinks. The anonymous source claims of ‘We know who it was, it was the Russians’ are beneath contempt.

“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two. And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”

Exposed in the leaks from hacks of the Democratic National Committee, Hillary Clinton, and campaign chair John Podesta was flagrant corruption and collusion amongst the Democrat Party, corporate media, Big Banks, and more. Although the Democrats appeared baffled by Donald Trump’s winning the White House, the sheer magnitude of underhanded dealings revealed in these leaked documents evinced every reason Americans have had their fill of establishment politics-as-usual.

Indeed, Red Scare finger-pointing at Russian interference — for which no unassailable evidence has yet been provided — has been widely condemned as a scapegoat for blame’s obvious and justifiable target.

Russia has found itself repeatedly the soft subject of blame in hegemonic affairs of the U.S. and its NATO allies — even amid a glaring dearth of evidence. Critics suggest the primary reason for this blame campaign surrounds the U.S.’ goal of regime change in Syria — where Russia militarily backs the government of Bashar al-Assad.

That alliance of two governments the United States has traditionally taken extreme issue with would, undoubtedly, provide ample cause for an otherwise baseless propaganda campaign. Wikileaks has endured scathing criticism for not publishing information about the now president-elect — but as found Julian Assange has repeatedly emphasized, the outlet cannot publish documents not provided by any source.

Establishment Democrats might have cautioned not to believe as valid anything Wikileaks publishes, but the whistleblowing outlet has for years offered a ransom prize to anyone able to prove its published documents forgeries or fakes — and, despite challenges, it remains unclaimed.

Concerning the leaks of DNC and Podesta emails, Murray asserted, “Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians. The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.”

READ MORE:  Turkey Demanded Russia Show Proof of their Role in ISIS Oil Trade - So They Just Did

According to the Daily Mail, Murray insisted “disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders” motivated the insider to leak the revealing documents.

Wikileaks has also claimed similar information — that Russia is not responsible for the leaks in question — but the publishing outlet maintains excruciating integrity and refuses to offer additional information on its sources.

Murray, like Assange and Wikileaks, refused to proffer additional information on his sources, but did say the claims of Russia’s involvement prompted the need to offer factual information on the disclosures.

“I don’t understand why the CIA would say the information came from Russian hackers when they must know that isn’t true,” he told the Daily Mail. “Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that.”

Cyber espionage and attacks are indeed standard fare in the playbooks of powerful nation states — as is psychological warfare, propaganda, and information control. As Murray suggests, it would be prudent to examine cui bono in this case — because the benefits in misinformation and deflection for the government of the United States far outweigh the blatant absurdity of Russian hacking claims.

Assange and others of more reasonable deportment have questioned U.S. anti-Russian hysteria on multiple fronts — to little avail.

“The Clinton camp has been able to project a neo-McCarthyist hysteria that Russia is responsible for everything,” Assange told journalist John Pilger in an interview in November.

“Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times, falsely, that 17 US intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That’s false – we can say that the Russian government is not the source.”

Assange — whose Internet connection has been severed by the Ecuadorian Embassy he’s been forced to call home — has tirelessly and vitally harped on the lack of evidence of Russian meddling in both the leaks and the presidential election.

For all intents and purposes, it would seem the political establishment simply refused to acknowledge its moot status in the average American voter’s mind — and despite glaring, neon signs condemning Hillary Clinton as a godawful candidate, refused to heed the onslaught.

While the political establishment — including a select few from the opposite side of the aisle — scramble to posit blame on a Russia convenient to multiple goals, the alternative media, Wikileaks, and rational humans have erected a steel wall of logic against this baseless propaganda in hopes rationale might yet win out.

Whatever your opinions on the incoming president of the once-free world, toying heedlessly with the results of a democratic election is a provocatively dangerous game — just ask Russia.

  • NewHampshire

    This is true but Trump is still a disaster. He must be stopped in the electoral college.

    • Welcometotehshow

      Sure, if you want a civil war I guess. Considering 70% of the armed forces voted for him, I’d say you better hope a bunch of sore losers aren’t threatening the electoral college (or bribing them).

      Just because you think he’s unfit because he isn’t a business as usual politician, and doesn’t subscribe to your ideology; doesn’t mean he’s actually unfit. You just want to subvert our democracy for your personal gain. And you’re willing to exaggerate the danger that is Donald Trump for the purposes of that.

      • Dr Studebaker

        OH Yes I couldn’t have said it any better then that what you wrote Bravo

      • AtheistPilgrim

        The fact he has six bankruptcies and has no knowledge of politics should disqualify. Especially since he refuses to take intelligence briefings but once a week. The last time we had a President who didn’t take his intelligence briefings, 9/11 happened.

        • Welcometotehshow

          Did you pull a muscle during that stretch?

          For one, experience in politics is not a needed skill. Our founders wanted this to be a civilians government and be runnable by anyone in it. It’s not like the president actually writes policy, he has entire teams of qualified people giving him ideas and working for him.

          And the knock on Bush is a complete joke. There was nothing that ever showed up in his security briefings that could have prevented 9/11. If you want to lay blame there, lay it at the feet of Bill Clinton. He’s the one who let them live and concoct a plan here for nearly a decade unnoticed and who wussed out when his Seal team had Bin Laden in his crosshairs.

          All I read in your post was “this isn’t the guy I wanted so I’m going to cling desperately to any excuse I can to prove that he’s unfit”. Well we have a process for unfit presidents, it’s called impeachment; and we’ll use it if it becomes clear that he is actually unfit.

          • AtheistPilgrim

            “There was nothing that ever showed up in his security briefings that could have prevented 9/11.” Except the security briefings he received saying an attack by bin Laden was imminent. Ones he then dismissed with a, “Now watch me make this shot.” comment on the golf course. And if we want to lay blame at someone’s feet, let’s lay it at Reagan’s for arming and fighting with the Taliban in the 80s, and directing the CIA to arm and train bin Laden. All I read in your post is a desperate attempt to justify why you voted for a Russian-backed oligarch and failed businessman with delusions of grandeur, who gives zero shits about common working-class people or anyone who doesn’t have a bank account in the billions who might be useful to him in some way. Guess what, you aren’t. He doesn’t care about your are your future or this country’s future, just how much money he can squeeze out of it. Its funny listening to him talk about bringing jobs back to America when his businesses all do their materials and labor shopping outside of the USA.

          • Micheal Obama

            You do realize why he has to have business and jobs outside of the US right?

          • AtheistPilgrim

            Because he’s an anti-American hypocrite.

    • IceTrey

      Obama is a disaster but we survived him for 8 years. We’ll survive Trump too.

  • Candice White

    Why would anyone believe anything this jackass has to say he is a friend of a lying POS rapist that’s is all I need to know and as for Freethinks I think you are in cahoots with Trump and wikishits.

    • Big Horn Staredown

      ^^^ either a David Brock bot or truly is confused. Keep up the great work TFTP

    • Welcometotehshow

      So we can ignore all messages or warnings a person says as long as you don’t like someone they’re friends with?

    • IceTrey

      Why would you believe the CIA?

      • T Love


        • legrand-alice

          I’ve generated $84 ,000 so far these days working online while I am a full time college student . I’m using a web based business project I found out about and after that I’ve generated such decent money . It’s extremely user-friendly and uncomplicated and also I’m just so happy that I discovered out about that . The possibility of success with this is never ending . Here’s what exactly I do>>> http://www.facebook.com/Canada-and-UK-home-job-employment-734519513357824/app/190322544333196/

    • kreskin

      You should have the word naive tattooed on your forehead. Or are you just another mindless Hillbot ?

    • George Reichel

      And we know that the CIA never ever lies.LMAO

      • John angel

        And they are never correct.

  • straight shooter

    This past summer a young DNC staffer named Seth Rich was gunned down in the street. His murder remains unsolved. It is alleged–and I firmly believe–that it was Rich who leaked to Assange incriminating evidence of the DNC sabotage of the Sanders campaign and was killed for it.

    Why is this relevant? Because right around that time is when Clinton and the MSM machine started in with the Russian hacking narrative. Now, when you consider Assange’s insistence on an inside leak and not hacking in this light, things start making a bit more sense.

    • AtheistPilgrim

      If there was any truth to the connection, Assange would have blown the whistle on it since there would be no more reason to protect his source.

      • Micheal Obama

        You’re wrong because if he outed this guy who got killed for leaking information sources would stop leaking to Wikileaks and Wikileaks would have a hard time getting new sources.

  • dustbusterz

    well, why would anyone believe Assange, when he continues to say its not Russia, but provides no proof that it is not.

  • AtheistPilgrim

    “Indeed, Red Scare finger-pointing at Russian interference — for which no unassailable evidence has yet been provided — has been widely condemned as a scapegoat for blame’s obvious and justifiable target.”

    Yet there is no unassailable evidence for this claim that your crap website has decided to publish as fact.

    • Micheal Obama

      Except for the fact that a guy that works for Wikileaks said it was a DNC leak lmao.

  • John Deer

    Obama, please let us know HOW they Hacked and WHAT or HOW they did it to swing the vote, I mean did they commit Voter FRAUD?? What the HELL did they do to change the Voting system.????? And now you are “THREATENING” Pres.Putin and Russia.???? Putin will slap the sh!t out of you, Obama. He has NO respect for your type and neither has the U.S. Military have respect for you. Bloody Skinny weak kneed Homo.!!!

  • concernedone

    I’m sorry but this discourse is hilariously insane. Clearly, Avatar & Straight Shooter are diligently attempting to teach some who are unteachable. This is not a slam or derogatory comment- just a statement of truth. It causes me heartache that there appears to be a portion of our natural born Americans still asleep. Wake up! Smell the roses but don’t close your mind to the thorned stem. Just because one might not believe in the ocean doesn’t save that one from drowning in perilous conditions. Many of us remember Viet Nam & the assassinations of the World Peacekeepers …J.F.K., Bobby, Martin Luther, Gandhi, Sadat… The controllers are devious & capable of anything. The programming is obviously instilled deep in some. Open your mind to all possibilities before making a decision. Open your heart to feel the difference between truth or deception. It’s not easy but I believe in the American people…I’m talking to you.