liable

Los Angeles, CA — As the Free Thought Project has reported extensively, police officers, even when found at fault for their abusive actions, are almost never held personally liable. It is the taxpayers who foot the bill. However, a new trend in accountability seems to be on the rise, and will be massively more effective at curbing police brutality than any system in place right now.

The most recent case of a police officer being held personally liable comes out of Los Angeles, where former Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca must decide within a week whether to pay $100,000 in damages — stemming from a civil lawsuit involving an inmate abuse case — or face liens on his assets, an attorney for the inmate said Friday, according to the LA Times.

The damages are from a 2013 judgment against Baca, three other deputies, and a captain. In that case, inmate Tyler Willis proved to a jury that he was punched and kicked repeatedly, shot with a Taser multiple times and struck “numerous times” in the ankle with a heavy metal flashlight, causing fractures and head injuries.

After a brief trial, the jury returned a verdict in Willis’ favor and held Baca personally liable. However, Baca, with the power of the police union, fought the ruling for the last 4 years, calling the idea of a police officer being held personally liable a “huge mistake.”

We disagree.

When police officers actually fear the loss of their own money, they may think twice before savagely beating a handcuffed woman or breaking into the wrong house and killing the innocent owner.

Advertisment
READ MORE:  "Video, Video" Cops' React to Video Camera at DUI Checkpoint & It Was Awesome

In spite of never winning an appeal, Baca has refused to pay and now Willis’ attorney is going one step further.

“Baca has to pay up or we will proceed to collect in debtors court,” Samuel Paz, an attorney for Willis said. “If necessary we will go forward with proceedings to identify his assets and place liens to collect on the debt.”

For those unfamiliar with the former sheriff, he was forced to resign in 2014 amid a massive scandal involving the horrendous abuse of inmates in his jail. While Baca quietly retired and skated out on punishment, more than two dozen of his underlings were convicted on criminal charges for their role in the abuse. Baca claims he had no idea that dozens of his employees were carrying out the abuse right under his nose for more than a decade.

Baca wasn’t the only officer held personally responsible in the 2013 lawsuit either. Anthony Vasquez, Mark Farino and Pedro Guerrero, and Daniel Cruz were found to be “malicious, oppressive or [act] in reckless disregard” of Willis’ rights.

Last week, all four of the officers agreed to pay $65,000 — their portion of the $165,000 lawsuit. However, Baca has continued to refuse.

It seems that Baca, who is currently drawing a $328,000 annual pension for the rest of his life — in spite of being a terrible cop — is holding out for the county to use taxpayer money.

However, in court documents, the county has noted that they have no intention of paying for Baca’s abuse.

This is the second such case in only weeks, in which cops are being forced to come out of pocket after being found at fault in a lawsuit. Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Deputy Adam Lin’s case was a bit more extreme than Baca’s, however.

READ MORE:  Video Shows Police Officers "Protecting & Serving" a Computer Science Student -- to Death

In 2013, Lin spotted 19-year-old Dontrell Stephens in a “high-crime area” — the man’s own low-income neighborhood — riding a bicycle in a manner the deputy found suspicious.

Lin stopped the youth, who dismounted the bike with a cell phone in his hand and slowly approached the officer. Just outside the range of dash cam video, the officer shot Stephens four times — claiming he was in fear for his life — but footage and evidence clearly showed the claim to be baseless.

Three of the bullets remain lodged in Stephens’ body, according to the Sun Sentinel — two in his arm and one in his spine, which left him paralyzed and dependent on a wheelchair for mobility.

Stephens won a massive $22.4 million settlement and U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry Seltzer ruled that Lin should foot at least a portion of the bill. Last month, nearly everything this officer owned was seized to pay back Stephens — including everything from his furniture to his clothing.

Lin will most assuredly think twice before shooting another unarmed teen.

As for Baca, however, it appears he has yet to learn his lesson and will have to be forced by the court to pay.

Imagine, for a moment, the result of all police officers being held personally liable for their actions. In nearly every other profession on the planet, if someone hurts someone else while on the job, they are held liable — personally. Why can’t cops carry personal liability insurance just like doctors?

As instances of police brutality and police killings continue to be exposed, there is no doubt that the US is in dire need of reform. The simple requirement for police to be insured for personal liability is an easy fix — especially to remove repeat offenders from the force.

READ MORE:  ‘Django Unchained’ Star Detained by Cops because they Claimed She was a Prostitute

All too often, when a tragic death such as Tamir Rice occurs, months later we find out that the officer should have never been given a badge and a gun in the first place because of their past. However, insurance companies, who can’t fleece the taxpayers to pay for problem cops, would have to come out of pocket to pay for them and would make sure that these officers are uninsurable.

If the officer becomes uninsurable, the officer becomes unhirable — simple as that.

There are likely many cops out there right now who would be denied insurance coverage by any company, due to their track records. A requirement for personal liability insurance would, quite literally, weed out problem officers — almost overnight.

SHARE
Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project. Follow @MattAgorist on Twitter, Steemit, and now on Facebook.
  • gregge

    Police departments should all be required to keep permanent records of complaints and disciplinary actions against officers. Those records should all go into a national database accessible by every police department. When hiring an officer who has left another department, the hiring department should be required to check that database. If a person has served in the military and left with anything other than an honorable discharge or a medical discharge for reasons that would not affect performance of police duties – he or she shouldn’t be a police officer. If you’ve nothing to prevent being hired as a police officer, but then go off the rails, you should be banned nationwide from being a police officer. I’d say give ONE chance to straighten up by going back to the raw recruit level through training, with a heavy emphasis on ethics and how to handle stressful situations. Classes on police abusing their authority etc. Screw up again and you’re out, permanently, because you’ve then firmly proved to be not to be trusted with the responsibilities that come with the job.

    Police officer is a difficult job and they need to have the temperament to stay cool and unflustered under stress. They need to really believe in the common protect and serve police motto. I bet a lot of potential bad apples could be weeded out by watching how people react to a series of videos of police committing various illegal acts. Anything that looks like supporting the officers on the screen would be a big red flag. Follow that observation up with a questionnaire covering various “professional courtesy” incidents that have actually happened where officers have covered for one another or let one another get away with things like speeding (when off duty or when on duty but not responding to a call or dispatch) and drunk driving.

    I want police that can demonstrate they have knowledge of ethical behavior and are disgusted and horrified by officers that abuse their position. A lot of cases of police screwing up really bad come from first making a mistake, then instead of stepping back from the problem they double down on stupid and keep making more mistakes – or worse, try to hide their mistake.

    One that could be used is the case of Caroline Small, chased down and murdered in 2010 by two officers in Georgia after an anonymous call was made about a woman sitting in a car “possibly doing drugs”. Instead of driving quietly to the location and checking things out, asking her if she needed help – they drove in, siren blaring. She took off and like a couple of wolves they chased. It ended with her car pinned in, immobile and a line of shots stitched across her windshield, ending with her shot in the head. The officers made callous comments and prevented medics from attending to her. Then they altered the scene of their crime and claimed they shot her because she was going to run them over. http://investigations.myajc.com/caroline-small-shooting/

    Nevermind that the complete dashcam video of the whole incident is available, they’ve gotten off scott free. Show that video to a room of recruits and I’d be wary of hiring anyone that isn’t retching and crying by the end of it. Think of Caroline’s last seconds as the shots came through the glass, starting on the passenger side, each one closer and closer. If you don’t find that horrifying and disgusting and terrible, then you should NOT be a police officer.