Without Providing Any Evidence of Hacking, Obama to Announce ‘Punishment’ Plan for Russia



According to the albeit dubious Washington Post, the Obama administration will soon announce retaliatory measures against Russia for the putative role it played installing Donald Trump in the White House.

Once again citing unnamed “U.S. officials,” the Post reports the punitive moves “are expected to include covert action that will probably involve cyber-operations,” and the public will learn precisely what’s planned “as early as this week.”

Of course, laughably unexplained by the Post is how these officials feel announcing covert actions to the public would be to the advantage of the administration — but the outlet has of late displayed a penchant for providing tangible information — including, most glaringly, on the topic of Russian interference in the U.S. election.

That Russian State actors meddled in the election — in particular, by hacking the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair John Podesta’s emails to provide information to Wikileaks — has yet to be backed by even a shred of legitimate evidence.

In fact, the Post and New York Times published articles citing unnamed officials from the CIA, who ostensibly concluded Russia — and President Vladimir Putin, himself — ‘hacked the election,’ without providing the most basic explanation for how this was possible, who had done so, or why the hack was undertaken. Yet, countless left-leaning corporate presstitutes parroted the report as if it constituted established fact.

Now, with the problematic announcement of a future announcement on how Obama will seek reprisals for the theoretical hack, it appears the corporate media and U.S. government will be complicit — sans unassailable proof — in an act of aggression against Russia, no matter what form it takes.

As the Post explains, President Obama sought to employ powers provided in an executive order issued last year “to punish and deter foreign hackers who harm U.S. economic or national security,” but officials felt it could not “punish the most significant cyber-provocation in recent memory against the United States — Russia’s hacking of Democratic organizations, targeting of state election systems and meddling in the presidential election.”

But did this “most significant cyber-provocation in recent memory” even occur?

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange — the one person with critical firsthand knowledge — vehemently denies the Russians provided the DNC and Podesta documents, saying the caches didn’t come from hacks at all, rather, an insider leaked the information for transparency’s sake.

Further, several veteran Intelligence officials, including former CIA analyst Ray McGovern and NSA whistleblower William Binney, issued a statement in agreement with Assange, noting, in part, “harder evidence of a technical nature points to an inside leak, not hacking — by Russians or anyone else.”

READ MORE:  When the FBI Knocks on Your Door, You Should Handle it Just Like This Woman

To act aggressively, whether online or by other means, against another government without first proving beyond doubt that nation, indeed, took offensive measures is ludicrous — not to mention reckless — and will itself be seen as a first strike.

These unnamed officials, who spoke with the Post on condition of anonymity, noted “the White House is working on adapting the authority to punish the Russians,” perhaps by declaring U.S. electoral systems part of “critical infrastructure” — thus protected, in addition to power grids and the like, under Obama’s executive order — and notably punishable by cyber or even military actions.

“Obama issued the executive order in April 2015,” the Post explains, “creating the sanctions tool as a way to hold accountable people who harm computer systems related to critical functions such as electricity generation or transportation, or who gain a competitive advantage through the cyber­­theft of commercial secrets.

“The order allows the government to freeze the assets in the United States of people overseas who have engaged in cyber-acts that have threatened U.S. national security or financial stability. The sanctions would also block commercial transactions with the designated individuals and bar their entry into the country.”

Issuing further sanctions against Russia would seem an unwise move, considering the Kremlin was already ruffled — and vowed to take “proper measures” — for financial penalties already inflicted over Russia’s actions concerning Ukraine.

“We regret that Washington continues this destructive line. We still disagree with this line and we believe that it very seriously harms our bilateral relations. Certainly, as this has been already in practice, the Russian side will take adequate measures,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told Russian media last Wednesday, according to TASS.

“We can only once again express regret and misunderstanding over this destructive persistence of our US colleagues.”

Yet, the U.S. continues posturing about theoretical Russian Hackers — a claim emphatically and repeatedly denied by the Kremlin.

Bravado hasn’t abated, and reached new heights over the last week, as again unnamed U.S. officials came forward exclusively to NBC News, saying Obama had used the legendary “Red Phone” to communicate directly with Putin on October 31, warning the Russian president “International law, including the law for armed conflict, applies to actions in cyberspace.”

Once again, however, this report from the corporate press constitutes plain Red Scare rhetoric designed to present the U.S. as the ‘tough guy’ in the situation — because that Red Phone is the standard means of communication between Washington and Moscow employed for typical negotiations.

Peskov, the Kremlin spokesman, dismissed the ominous overtones implied by NBC and other mainstream American outlets, noting, “this is a normal secure communication line, which the heads of state use for telephone negotiations.”

READ MORE:  Conspiracy Theorists Vindicated: FBI Docs Reveal "Shadow Government" Protecting Hillary Clinton

On December 9, the Washington Post published its dubiously ill-supported report citing an unnamed senior U.S. official — not specifying whether this person was part of an agency, bureau, or any other government body — who claimed,

“It is the assessment of the intelligence community that Russia’s goal here was to favor one candidate over the other, to help Trump get elected. That’s the consensus view.”

Further, the Post reported, “The CIA has concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency, rather than just to undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system, according to officials briefed on the matter.”

However, no consensus had been reached among the 17 agencies of the Intelligence Community — in fact, as Reuters reported, “While the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) does not dispute the CIA’s analysis of Russian hacking operations, it has not endorsed their assessment because of a lack of conclusive evidence that Moscow intended to boost Trump over Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton, said the officials, who declined to be named.”

A lack of unanimity on the assertion Russia tampered in the election should, under any circumstances, quash plans to retaliate — but belligerent rhetoric continues and the legality of issuing a response the U.S. deems appropriate is under consideration.

Indeed, during the Red Phone conversation with Putin, Peskov asserted, Obama repeatedly mentioned Russian cyber attacks against the U.S.,

“But each time, unfortunately, we could not get some more or less reasonable substantiation of these accusations, some specific facts or something else.

“And, that is why, of course, all these accusations are completely unfounded and are not backed by any arguments.”

Nonetheless, the corporate media machine continues splashing the vapid accusation across headlines in lockstep with Obama, who antagonistically vowed retribution, stating,

“I think there is no doubt that when any foreign government tries to impact the integrity of our elections . . . we need to take action. And we will — at a time and place of our own choosing. Some of it may be explicit and publicized; some of it may not be.”

This perilous volley of threats and evidence-less allegations have amplified hostilities between the two former Cold War foes to an astonishing degree — some analysts have even warned such posturing could set the foundation for armed conflict.

In the interest of preventing a needless war and to set the record straight, journalist Jason Leopold and PhD candidate at MIT and research affiliate at Harvard, Ryan Shapiro, filed myriad Freedom of Information Act requests seeking further information on allegations of Russian hacking and election interference.

Unsurprisingly, that effort proved even more fruitless than expected — and the pair has now filed a lawsuit against the CIA, FBI, Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence for failing to comply with the requests.

Recode reports:

“According to the Department of Justice, agencies are required to notify the party who issued the information request within 10 days of receiving a letter asking for expedited processing. Leopold and Shapiro first sent their FOIA request to the FBI, DHS, CIA and the ODNI on Dec. 14 and a second request to the CIA on Dec. 15 […]

“The plaintiffs seek information about any ongoing investigation into ties between Donald Trump or anyone associated with his campaign and interference from the Russian government in the election. Leopold and Shapiro also asked for communications between Congress and the Republican and Democratic campaign committees, as well as Hillary Clinton’s campaign in reference to Russian involvement with the 2016 presidential race.”

Whether their effort will result in proof linking Russia to the hacks — or to President-elect Trump — remains to be seen.

Russia has also tired of the belligerent rhetoric bandied about by Obama and American presstitutes, as Peskov recently asserted the United States must “either stop talking about it or finally produce some evidence, otherwise it all begins to look unseemly.”

READ MORE:  China Responds to US Posturing, Unveils Nuclear Missile System Capable of Hitting US Bases in Asia

Now, Americans find themselves in the uncomfortable position under the governance of an administration discussing retaliatory measures against world and nuclear power, Russia — while still waiting for the State to provide even a modicum of evidence it would have grounds to do so.

  • David Daisy May Boldock

    Putin as ever proves what a totally incompetent, devious, dubious bastard this Muslim fakir is.

  • Marten

    “People that elect corrupt Politicians…are not Victims….but Accomplices”-George Orwell-
    For the “greater Good” for the collective/state comrades

  • James L Colter

    We don’t need no stinking ebidence!

  • Guy

    A couple of points; A. Russia has always taken the position of deny and cover up, no matter what is the circumstances. As case in point, the recent dope scandal of there Olympic Athletes. The downing of the Airliner over the Ukraine. Even when caught with the hand in the cookie jar, they say it’s not true ! So could hacking have been attempted ? Maybe. Considering China, has and dose at any chance they can get for military trade secrets and economic advantages !
    B. This is all coming from a lame duck president, who said he could have won a 3rd term, gave us Obamacare, paid off Iran, while denying it and let the big Wall Street Banks, take our taxpayers money to bail themselves out of there own mess, created by them, and nobody was ever even prosecuted for it !?

    • The downing of the Airliner over the Ukraine…. you mean the one that had its FINAL report on who shot it down BANNED from publication? The jet that was shot down was NEVER proved to be shot down by the Russians. After the remains were taken and examined, all of the final reports were stopped from ever going public and NOBODY, not a single fuking media outlet has spoken a word since… like it NEVER happened….

      • Guy

        Just more proof that if they deny it long enough and loud enough, along with a few well timed and planted News Paper Headlines ! You can convince the world that, even the Devil Doesn’t Exist !

        • nick98514

          Your a feckin moron!

  • Harry L

    All just a distraction from the content of those emails that implicate John Podesta as a pedophile.

    • kristina.cornell

      I’ve made $84 ,000 up till now soon working over the internet and consequently I am only a full time student . I’m using a web based business marketing opportunity I found out about and additionally I’ve generated such type of decent cash . It’s extremely user-friendly and uncomplicated and also I’m just too satisfied that I found out about it . The possibility within this is unlimited . Here’s everything I do>>>

    • monica-morrison

      I’ve earned $84 ,000 by far soon working on-line and I’m a full time college student . I’m implementing a web business marketing opportunity I observed and in addition I’ve made this kind of good money . It is actually extremely user-friendly and uncomplicated so I am just too delightful that I discovered out regarding it . The potential with this is endless . Here’s what exactly I do>>>

  • GuessWho?

    I’m sure he’s got ‘plans’ and isn’t just bluffing. Why else would he tell everyone ahead of time so Russia could prepare for a cyberattack?

  • nick98514

    You mean Obomber intends to punish them more than he already has, without a scintilla of evidence? after already having the CIA assassinate the Russian Ambassador to Turkey? and also having the CIA shoot down a Russia plane killing all 92 innocent people that were on board?….he want’s to punish them more? WTF?… when there is absolutely “NO” proof whatsoever that Russia interfered in the US elections at all, and even his own security services, all except the CIA, disagree with the findings of the CIA?….I sure hope they have these same unbelievable low standard’s of “proof” when Obombo and the rest of the Treasonous bastards are in Court for treason!….It will be a “Slam Dunk” that he’s gonna get hung for “Treason” and hopefully the rest of the criminal cabal as well!…and rightly so as well I might add,…. IMHO of coarse! :-).

  • nick98514

    Am I wrong in thinking this?, in my opinion anyone who financially AIDS and sells Arms & munitions to a foreign regime and that regime is an officially named enemy of the USA and the West….am I wrong, or is this the very definition of “Treason” in the US judicial code book, of the Military codes of conduct?…If so, can someone please explain to me why President Obama, all the Neocon’s and his CIA handlers and all the rest of those accomplices been arrested by the civil police? or the military police, MP’s or whatever you want to call them?…Surely it is their sworn “Duty” to do so?….when the F++k is someone over their in the US gonna wake up & smell the coffee?…c’mon guy’s before he skip’s the country to Qatar as he & the Clinton’s have planned to do?…..WAKE THE FU+K UP PLEASE!. It’s time to do “Something” before it’s to late?, that treasonous fu+ker Obama would have launched some nukes by now if he had the capability!…..Ya don’t think so?.

  • Democrats do not need evidence or proof, they will create it after the fact. The victors write the history. Oooops. They lost and for good reason.

  • Bacrook will trigger an international incident that Trump will have to deal with.

  • john robel

    Typical commie democrat propaganda and hypocrisy. First of all where is the evidence? 2nd, it is fine and dandy for the killary cunton foundation to accept donations from foreign governments. PAY FOR PLAY. 3rd, is this the result of killary cunton’s “reset button”? Reset what? Maybe it’s the muslim homosexual mulatto commie in chief’s “more negotiable after my last election,” negotiation. Gotta go, I have the urge to puke.

  • Hilda Holcomb

    Without Proof..

  • Jay Wood


  • brooks_patty

    I’ve generated $84 ,000 until now sometime this year working on the net and also I’m a full time college student . I’m by making use of an online business marketing opportunity I discovered and even I’ve made this kind of great money . It’s undoubtedly user friendly not to mention I’m just so glad that I found out about that . The potential using this is never ending . Here’s everything that I do>>> http://newyr42.weebly.com