youtube

In May, Maryland residents Mike and Heather Martin temporarily had two of their children taken away by child protective services as a result of a video they made depicting their children crying, in what some have said was a sick stunt. The parents, who run a YouTube channel called DaddyOFive, seemed shocked when their children were removed from the home, but critics contend they abuse their children.

Unfortunately, children being depicted as unwilling participants in controversial videos has spurned a debate over what is appropriate for children, what may have been created for pedophiles, and what parents need to know. Thanks to comedian Daniel Tosh, this disturbing world of YouTube child exploitation is getting some much-needed coverage.

Home movies have been around as long as video cameras. But with the rise of child pornography, the proliferation of pedophiles and the accompanying technology, a renewed vigilance to protect the innocence of our nation’s youth is needed.

Not only did Tosh expose this darkness, but in a recent publication by Vigilant Citizen, a disturbing discovery was made about online videos, principally located on YouTube, which depict real children in bizarre and unnatural situations. Here’s what they found.

Children with access to YouTube can be tricked into watching videos featuring their favorite Disney characters such as Mickey Mouse. Here’s Mickey getting his ears cut off by scissors.

Here’s Elsa from the movie “Frozen” showing her having sex with Spider-Man.

Advertisment

Here’s another featuring the same two characters.

Then there’s the videos which play upon some children’s worst fears.

Here are two infants with fake cockroaches on their faces.

This one shows a giant tarantula crawling on a toddler in a onesie.

But what might be the most disturbing of the videos we uncovered was revealed to us, ironically, by Daniel Tosh. The outspoken comedian and purveyor of controversial videos and off-color topics, was seemingly disturbed by what he learned.

READ MORE:  Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube Sign Pledge to Suppress Speech and Promote 'Counter Narratives'

“I’ll level with you. I may have stumbled upon something dark here,” Tosh said.

“Anyone watching these videos needs to put some pants on and turn themselves into the FBI.”

He told his viewers that the children, who star in a YouTube channel called Seven Super Girls, may be unaware of how they’re being marketed, and to which specific audience. Tosh staged a To Catch a Predator” style spoof on the type of viewers who were watching the seven girls’ videos. You guessed it….pedophiles. Unfortunately, their videos are extremely popular and serve as an indictment to the world’s pedophilic attractions.

The channel has nearly 3,000 videos uploaded. But this is no ordinary children’s show, and without a doubt, 1980’s era censors would have driven themselves mad in an attempt to shut down the perversion.

At first glance, the Seven Super Girls YouTube homepage, arguably, looks like one’s favorite porn site. Each under-18 girl has her own subchannel. To the unwitting, however, the site may look like girls dressed like girls, engaging in activities which girls enjoy — going to camp, hanging with friends by the pool, and playing dress up.

But to a pedophile, the site is a smorgasbord of smut, carefully crafted to serve as eye candy for adults and teenagers to indulge in their child-sex fantasies. After we clicked on the entire list of videos and selected to sort by most popular, it became clear to us at The Free Thought Project, the videos are in no way innocent.

The first video titled “Lucy’s Morning Routine” shows a young girl licking a cream pie. The video has 138 million views, yet never rises above the level of a bad Pee Wee Herman episode. Why so many views? Tosh believes it’s simply a visual feast for pedophiles.

READ MORE:  Mainstream Normalizes Pedophilia with 'Victoria Secret'-Style Lingerie Show Featuring 5yo Girls

The second video is labeled “Escaping from Your Bed In The Morning!!” and features a young child immobilized on a bed with duct tape. What might be an interesting video to children is certainly a child bondage video for predators, who gorge on the fantasies elicited from the viewing.

Our investigation into the Seven Super Girls channel uncovered an incredibly disturbing phenomenon. The girls are all selected as stars of the channel by uploading an audition video to SAKs channels, pronounced “Sax” and eerily close to “Sex” — we believe on purpose. You decide for yourself. When you click on the link to the YouTube video, the official SAKs channels are listed in the comments section.

The video even warns to be wary of fake Seven Super Girls channels. Do you have any idea why? Because pedophiles set up their own fake audition sites so that they can have access to the personal information of children and teens they would choose to exploit. There’s no way uploading a video of one’s child to any of the SAKs sites is an exercise in good parenting.

It’s highly probable that the children, teens, and adults who are creating and uploading the videos have no idea, or don’t care, that pedophiles are gorging on their videos. All of which makes the seriousness of the proliferation and views of the videos that much more disturbing. How can parents, teens, and children resist the temptation to be internet famous? After all, if the Jenner girls are all doing it, why shouldn’t they? That’s a fair question.

The Seven Super Girls channel has nearly 7 million subscribers, and their videos have been viewed 7.4 billion times. The information under the “about” tab shows a business email for the site to be enquiries@sevensupergirls.com. Notice the word “enquiries” is written in British English, not the American English spelling of “Inquiries”.

READ MORE:  Netflix Series Exposes Govt-Connected Child Sex Ring in Baltimore, Police Forced to Respond

The New York Times wrote the following about the SAKs channels;

The SAKs channels, as they are known, were started in 2008 by seven families in Britain who, in the early days of YouTube, wanted to make sure their children were making family-appropriate content. The only remaining parent of that original partnership is Ian Rylett, who is currently in charge of the SAKs operation.

It’s safe to say that the family-appropriate content has taken a backseat to pedophile appealing content. Other than the New York Times article, little is known about Mr. Rylett who runs the SAKs corporation, which employs a staff of six.

Mr. Rylett, who lives in Leeds, said producing the channels was essentially his full-time job. He and a team of six others take care of copyright issues, create sponsorship deals, come up with weekly themes, monitor the channels and arrange meet and greets. The tickets for a 1,000-seat event that is coming up in Orlando, Fla., are selling for $30 each.

We want our readers to think for themselves. If you’re a parent or are thinking about being one, and want to protect your children from pedophiles, by all means, visit the Seven Super Girls YouTube channel. Decide for yourself if Mr. Rylett and his team are doing a good job of monitoring the content of the children’s videos to prevent the site from becoming food for famished pedophiles.

As The Free Thought Project has reported on many occasions, a vast pedophile network exists in the U.K., which has even incriminated former UK Prime Minister, Sir Edward Heath.

SHARE
Jack Burns is an educator, journalist, investigative reporter, and advocate of natural medicine
  • David Daisy May Boldock

    Ted Heath was indeed up to his neck in it, and it goes much higher than that.

    They all need their bollocks chopping off, and preferably with a dull rusty knife that i have and would gladly do the deed with glee, and for free.

  • Damiana

    YouTube really DOES need to step up and do something about the child exploitation going on through their site. It’s FAR more than just “pedophiles” abusing children on these sites. There’s the sick fucks like DaddyOFive and then there’re those “stage mom” psychos who expect their kid to make them rich by being the next “viral sensation.”

    Children who are “performing” on YouTube should be subject to SOME kind of scrutiny, most especially when/if there’s “ad revenue” money being collected by an adult.

    • BRANDONtheSNITCH

      You seem like a know it all

      • Damiana

        There’s a good reason for that! *winks flippantly*

        • BRANDONtheSNITCH

          Smile politely wait here

    • Not pro Israel

      You sound like Equalozer

  • IceTrey

    So basically no underage girl, or boy I guess, should post vids because a pedo might watch them?

    • Damiana

      That’s not exactly the point, but there ARE certain kinds of videos that appeal to pedophiles – children should ABSOLUTELY be protected from being tricked into a “swimming” video that some skeezebag is going to put in his spank bank.

    • kkruger71

      I just went and looked up the channel. There seem to be a large amount of their videos that focus on them in bikinis, doing gymnastics, and bedroom stuff (sleepovers, etc). It doesn’t take a genius to see what’s going on.

      • IceTrey

        Young girls are making videos for other young girls? If they were working on an engine in tight shorts and tshirts would that be ok?

        • Damiana

          Again, you’re missing the point. Just because the kids don’t know they’re being marketed to pedophiles DOES NOT make it OK. These girls are going to grow up and realize how they’ve been used and it is NOT going to make them feel good about the world when they finally understand that all those “fun videos” they were tricked into making were actually pornography for sneaky pedophile perverts!

          • IceTrey

            So you think all their parents are in on exploiting their little girls to pedos?

          • Damiana

            I don’t know – do YOU think this is OK, so long as everyone but the perverts are clueless?

          • IceTrey

            You think all 68 million views are from pervs?

          • Damiana

            There ARE a lot of them out there, y’know.

          • IceTrey

            And most abuse family members not Youtubers.

          • Damiana

            This kind of shit starts by watching YouTube, until the sicko convinces himself that he’s actually being SEDUCED by these girls and then it escalates to “family members.”

            Do NOT presume to sit there and tell me how sexual child abuse works. Just fucking don’t and leave it at that.

          • IceTrey

            So there was no abuse prior to 2007?

          • Damiana

            I’ve asked you nicely to drop it. You wanna keep it up (on THIS, of all subjects) and start a fucking beef? I guaran-goddamn-TEE that will not end the way you expect it will!

          • IceTrey

            No one forced youn to reply to any of my comments. Is this Anita Sarkeesian?

          • Damiana

            In any case, good night and best of luck defending… this sort of thing. (Not really, though – if you’re going to make excuses for pedophilic perversions, I hope you step on a fucking Lego!)

          • IceTrey

            WTF are you talking about? I’m saying that channel is for kids to watch not pedos. It’s sad how you see the world.

          • Damiana

            *shakes her head in defeat* Your naivete is… charming, in a way. If you’re really as clueless as you’re acting, then I am sorry for being such a cunt to you. However, you’re still wrong. The fact that a channel appears to be “for kids” does NOT mean that it’s just for kids.

            Children don’t naturally fixate on things like swimming, gymnastics, and slumber parties. If you can’t see a pattern in these videos, then good for your innocence, but please remove your ass from the Grownup Discussion about this, because there IS a pattern and it IS disgusting and unacceptable for the producers of these videos to cater to pedophiles out of greed for more clicks.

          • IceTrey

            Wow you really are damaged.

          • Damiana

            *curls her lips in an icy sort of smile* You really have no idea, kiddo!

          • Fred Figglehorn

            Pretty Sure this would of got taken down a long time ago if it was exploit children

          • Damiana

            Right, because exploiting children is a thing that humanity just Does. Not. Do. and never has. *rolls her eyes in sarcasm and disdain*

          • Andropov

            It’s probably better to be damaged than it is to be this willfully ignorant.

          • IceTrey

            It’s the worst to be a paranoid fear mongerer.

          • Christopher Russell

            I agree 100%. This is fear mongering bullshit. I just watched a couple videos and it’s kids making videos for other kids. My eleven year old son makes videos. Anyone who sees anything sexual in them is the real deviant !

          • valkyrry

            I’m career law enforcement and right now there is no way to keep channels for “kids & their friends” JUST for kids and their friends, and to keep pedophiles out

          • IceTrey

            Yeah so?

          • valkyrry

            “Yeah so?” = very astute. don’t believe me – here’s some more about kids doing unsafe sh*# on the web that you can gnaw on and spit out:
            https://www.realsimple.com/work-life/technology/safety-family/internet-safety

          • IceTrey

            I believe you that sketchy people view videos that doesn’t nean you should see them behind every tree. Kids are most likely to be abused by a family member or friend.

          • Arlinda Nash-Coffel

            Some people make a WHOOOLE lotta money on youtube channels.

        • Stephen Cameron

          I’m not going to have a look at this channel, not curious enough but even children and young teenagers need to be careful with what they share, you can cry for freedom all you want but if you have ever been targeted by this “children deserve more freedom” tactic by sex offenders as a child and grow up you realise how vulnerable children are and understand why they need certain levels of protection that might otherwise seem unnecessary

          • IceTrey

            That’s different than saying the SSG channel is for pedos.

          • Stephen Cameron

            Have you got something constructive to say? Just because something doesn’t intentionally target or expose this behaviour doesn’t mean nothing should be done, for example, sometimes it’s hard to imagine, if you saw a nude photo of a young girl you might think it’s innocent, publish it online and it’s a different story altogether

          • IceTrey

            Done about what? Arrest everyone who watches the channel. This is nothing but SJW fear mongering which is weird coming from TFTP.

          • Damiana

            Not really – TFTP has been profoundly outspoken against pedophilia in all its ugly manifestations.

          • IceTrey

            Didn’t they call BS on Pizzagate? Same thing here.

          • Damiana

            Link me to that article, because every mention I’ve seen about “Pizzagate” around here points out that just because this one wacko was wrong this one time doesn’t mean that ALL accusations of pedophilia are likewise hysterical nonsense.

          • Pink Unicorn

            #PizzaGate is real!

          • Tha Lo Ryder

            Children in their early teens know exactly what they are doing when they wear sexy clothes and provocative poses. It’s part of growing up. They are not however doing it to appeal to adult fantasy but to their peers.
            I haven’t seen the videos so I may be talking out of place, but pre-adolescents have no business expressing sexuality in a video and youtube should probably consider censoring those.

          • Buford T. Justice

            These are vids for children (millions of them btw), not adults like you. You •shouldn’t• be watching them — but neither should you opine on something you haven’t seen.

    • Andropov

      Sure, if you amended that to “no underage girl, or boy I guess, should post vids of themselves in compromising outfits and situations to channels or sites that market them like porn.”

      • IceTrey

        What are you talking about? You haven’t even seen channel.

        • Andropov

          That’s an awfully big assumption to be making. It also isn’t much of an argument to simply accuse me of ignorance. Particularly since some fairly damning evidence is laid out literally just above this comment section.

          • IceTrey

            Oh it was that other guy.

  • Matthew

    There’s a comedy club here called SAKs lol. I appreciate the honest journalism, but let’s not go out on a witch hunt here cause words SOUND similar lol. In my experience, when trying to hide obvious pedo shit, they do NOT leave clues that any normal person would know about, so this is likely some low hanging fruit

    • channa

      How much experience do you have in hiding obvious pedo shit?

      • Matthew

        I’m sorry, did I offend the master at hiding child porn? Please, allow me to step aside so you can educate us all, mr. fucks little children guru 😉

        • Oh fuck off, you know what he meant creep

          • Matthew

            yea, and I just pointed out that HE didn’t understand what he meant.

  • ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING
    Have you guys noticed the PEDO symbols DIRECTLY on Twitter’s Translation Center webpage? https://thelightinthedarkplace.wordpress.com/2017/06/12/twitter-inc-direct-affiliation-with-protecting-dark-net-elite-pedophilia-network/ Please keep raising awareness – SAVE THE KIDS!

  • Leanne Millar

    The picture of the babies with the cockroaches is fake, they are those ‘Reborn babies’ and are made to look as realistic as possible. The other fake is the tarantula with the child!!!!

    • Naji Wench

      It doesn’t matter…kids are viewing these images.

      • Leanne Millar

        Kids (Not mine as I don’t believe in them getting things before there age, ) play with all sorts of movies, music videos and games so they have have built up a tolerance

        • Pink Unicorn

          One should never build up a tolerance to sick perversion.

          • Leftists Aren’t Liberals

            Such as murdering children in the womb?

      • morphoyle

        Why are kids on the internet unsupervised? What kind of parent allows that?

      • Ambaa

        Why would children be watching a video of reborn dolls with bugs? It’s not directed at children, not marketed to children, and not meant to appeal to children. For goodness sake, supervise your kids when they are on Youtube!

  • channa

    Ask someone to teach you about parental controls.

  • ShadowFalls

    One does have to love this world at times. Creating a problem out of a non-problem.

  • Judith Lewis

    Some ppl in their comments missed the point of the article. Their focus is on a word. This is sad.

  • Shania Hunter

    Gee, I wouldn’t have any objections to the duct taped girl on the bed if not for the crease in the duct tape right near her nether region, as, such shaping could only occur if the child’s nether region was thoroughly smoothed by hand.

  • Ambaa

    You make it sound like DaddyOFive was just an innocent misunderstanding around one video. It’s an entire channel of very cruel behavior to children showing their emotional trauma.

  • Christopher Russell

    Are you fucking kidding me?!? This is embarrassing. First off, SAKs stands for Seven Awesome Kids, the original channel they had and has nothing to do with “sex”! Next, you are the pedophiles if you see anything sexual in those videos. You’re basically trying to trash an income source to young entrepreneurs with lies and innuendos. I expect this kind of fear mongering and bullshit from Republicans but not Libertarians.

  • Frank M.

    Did you know that sometimes people pay someone to pad youtube views. Here is how one did it. It’s a business.

    https://www.dailydot.com/upstream/how-to-buy-youtube-views/

  • Buford T. Justice

    SAKs channels vids are made by and for children, and the kids LOVE them. They are a •sanctuary• for young girls from the hypersexualized fare thrown at them from every other quarter of the internet every day. Please, social justice warriors, visit the comments section of this channel and know the audience whereof you speak. You’ll be the oldest one there.

    Why am I so certain the only folks playing white knight over this particular scandal are young, childless men?

  • Bill Clay

    DemocRats…. can’t live with them….. CAN live without them!

  • crazytrain2

    Tosh.0 does little else than scour YouTube for videos, so I am not surprised they found this. As for the “more effective than police” no local department has jurisdiction over this unless the issue is taking place within their borders

  • valkyrry

    To those apologists for the sick adults/teens making these vids, who’s looking at babies with bugs on them and thinking anything BUT “EEWWW! Get the damn things OFF the poor kid!” or the duct-tape girl and NOT internally scrambling to free her – Really? Kids should look at this and be amused? They should, in other words, learn to inure themselves to the pain or misfortune of other children (OR adults)? You no doubt took your (own, nephews, etc) kids to fireworks and laughed when they flinched at the noise.