Renowned Physics Magazine Concludes in New Report: All 3 WTC Towers Collapsed Due to Controlled Demolition


New York, NY – Over the past 15 years many highly respected academics and experts have come forward to challenge the official narrative on the collapse of the WTC towers forwarded by the U.S. government. The official government position holds that the collapse of all three towers was due to intense heat inside of the buildings.

But a new forensic investigation into the collapse of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11, published in Europhysics News – a highly respected European physics magazine – claims that “the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.”


While many in the mainstream have attempted to label anyone questioning the official narrative as “tin foil hat” conspiracy theorist, many highly respected experts have come forward to lampoon the idea that the buildings collapsed due to the intense heat and fires following two terrorist-directed plane crashes.

“Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities,” the four physicists conclude in the damning report.

The new report is the work of Steven Jones, former full professor of physics at Brigham Young University, Robert Korol, a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer with over 25 years of structural design experience in the aerospace and communications industries and Ted Walter, the director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a nonprofit organization that today represents more than 2,500 architects and engineers.

READ MORE:  9/11 Gave Us the Police State With the 'Patriot' Act, After Vegas Get Ready for 'USA Liberty' Act

The comprehensive report in Europhysics Magazine directly challenges the official narrative and lends to a growing body of evidence that seriously questions the veracity of the government narrative.

In 2002, the National Institute of Standards and Technology remarked that the case was exceptionally bizarre. There were no other known cases of total structural collapses in high-rise buildings caused by fires and so it is deeply unusual that it should have happened three times in the space of one day, noted NIST.

Official investigations have never been able to thoroughly and coherently explain how this might have happened and various teams tasked with examining the collapse have raised difficult questions about the veracity of the government’s story.

Perhaps most damning of all, the experts claimed that after a thorough forensic analysis of video footage of the building’s collapse, it revealed signs of a controlled implosion. Additionally, Jones has co-authored a number of papers documenting evidence of unreacted nano-thermitic material in the WTC dust.

The authors of the report note that the buildings fell with such speed and symmetry that they there was no other feasible explanation for the sudden collapse at free fall speeds – directly refuting studies that attempted to debunk the idea that the building fell without resistance. These respected experts’ new forensic analysis only adds to the growing movement of people calling for a new and impartial investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center.

Revealing the scope and breadth of public disbelief in the official government narrative surrounding the events of 9/11, even presidential candidate Jill Stein has recently called for a new investigation.

READ MORE:  BREAKING: 800 Families File Lawsuit Against Saudi Arabia for Role in 9/11

UPDATE: TFTP originally referred to the report in this magazine as a ‘study.’ It is only a report. We apologize for the oversight. However, this does not change its impact or its importance. 

Jay Syrmopoulos is a geopolitical analyst, freethinker, and ardent opponent of authoritarianism. He is currently a graduate student at the University of Denver pursuing a masters in Global Affairs and holds a BA in International Relations. Jay's writing has been featured on both mainstream and independent media - and has been viewed tens of millions of times. You can follow him on Twitter @SirMetropolis and on Facebook at SirMetropolis.
  • Roman Marquez

    Years ago you spun circles around someone yet you still have to call him names and make unproven remarks questioning his abilities to think?

  • Roman Marquez

    You ask two irrelevant hypothetical questions,and that makes you an intelligence assessor?

  • Roman Marquez

    A lot was learned from the blind sheik WTC bombing, that went into the planning of 911whoever it was, used Davey Crockett suitcase nukes,that were designed to be shoulder fired(although no human has ever attempted to shoulder fire one) refurbished in israel, they provided the heat needed to melt the steel beams but leave the outer walls intact, what else would explain the radiation levels and the illnesses of the first responders? although that doesnt mean explosives werent also used,building 7 not as tall as the twin towers,was likely just a controlled demolition. Call me names ,question my intelligence ,attack my integrity, but, now you know.

  • mrmars72

    The journal in question doesn’t have a high impact factor, and the editors dustance themselves from the conclusions of the article. Not a resounding endorsesment of the hypothesis.

  • Erik Öhman
    • Erik Öhman

      where are the holes from the pair of wings?
      where is the holes from the jet engines?
      There are quite the flaws in the government story. Obviously.

  • Gary Youree

    This has been obvious to any critically minded person since 01.
    What is most frightening and revealing in so many different areas of discussion by the mainstream media are the implications connected to all news stories.
    I only watch the mainstream media in attempt to understand their version of the news by – who benefits?
    IF there is another investigation, it will be worthless if they do not start with the premise that the towers were intentionally brought down.
    IMO – there are many complicent in the destruction and, as all government business is, initiated by the corporatocracy and carried out by the government and military.
    Who benefitted?

  • Gary Youree

    I must add; the facts of this destruction and the resulting comments from the corporate media, alternative media (TV), satire news shows, the Bill Mayer’s and Michael Moore’s, celeb-scientists in mass, and finally what we see here – shows the hierarchy of censorship, its institution related to viewing population, (in order of information forms mentioned); the omission and dismissiveness from corporate media, the fear of being shut down (TV alternative media), the turncoats of the sub-set of the 1% (entertainment media), and what we see here (population of viewers unknown). Freedom here = food for the thought police (bots).
    God I would love to know what the percentage of people are aware of the who (psychopath elite) and the how (end or cancer stages of capitalism) are aware of this truth.
    Denial is understandable – not unlike a critical dissection of one’s religion. Governments, as religions, are many in number. Reasonable – if one is wrong it is just as likely the next is wrong.
    To understand this one must accept that humanity has one true physical divide; the psychopath who has risen to the top of corporate structures – and the majority remainder of humanity. These are two species – one preying upon the other in conjunction with humans traitorous to humanity.

  • Eleanor LeTourneau

    Was watching TV news story on my laptop a week or so ago and not paying to much attention when someone mention 9/11 and mention that President Bush gave a speech were he said that the Towers had explosives in certain areas that if something happened they would go off to keep the tower from falling over onto nearby structures or something to that effect and it showed him giving that speech Thats what happens when your on your laptop and watching TV at the same time should know better not good at multi-tasking. So has anyone seen it also. Have seen a couple 9/11 films but liked the one were it showed about 6-7 high rise hotel fires and one plane hitting one an causing a fire none of them came down, all were rebuilt. One I remember very well for it was on TV and people were jumping off the very top and was a very elegant and tall hotel. Another thing read about was that serial numbers on plane parts did not match the plane that was supposed to have gone down.

  • Eleanor LeTourneau

    Want to bet, we have started 7 wars in the middle east, disposed duely elected offficials and have sold or given arms to isis an other the other terrorist groups to fight Assad. You have to stop watching our Media and go World Wide plus some shows like on YOU TUBE do show what other countries have films of. Try watching THE JIMMY DORN SHOW you may have your eyes and ears opened. Another country we have screwed up is Hondouras, thank Hillary for that one.

  • Eleanor LeTourneau

    I have also, now I wonder how Bush giving that speech slipped up and mention explosives in the towers to keep them from falling over in a terrorist attact onto other buildings. Have to find that film of that speech.

    • Lee Ann Guill

      It’s in the video.

    • Lee Ann Guill

      Or maybe not, I did watch videos that played after this one so not sure but I did see it.

    • Tracey Lester


  • Eleanor LeTourneau

    There are others who have made films on this and one of them has given herproof on this. A well know sciencetist but don’t keep my files very neat and am always loosing my bits of papers but she is out there. The only trouble is even if had it many like you would not believe her. Maybe you have seen the special on Demolishions of buildings and how they go about doing them and what they look like coming down. The Twin Towers to a T.

  • Eleanor LeTourneau

    What did some firefighters see that was running under all the collasped rubble. Many of them said it looked like molten steel or a river of lava and that it stayed like that for days. What could make that happen?

    • MileHigh

      When fire burns in an enclosed space it generates heat energy. If that heat energy has nowhere to go then the temperature goes up and up and up. So you can burn ordinary wood and in the right enclosed space it will get hot enough to melt steel. The whole line “jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel” is nonsense said by people making a false “definitive statement” because they don’t understand basic physics.

    • Richard Norgard

      They found evidence of thermite, which can melt steel.

  • elizabetta

    Yeah, because none of us saw the planes fly into those buildings.

  • Gravity WORKS!

  • Theresa Crosby

    then tell me why did all the people have to die the way they did? it seems like an awful loss of life for a controlled demolition

    • Johnny Smith

      If they had told everyone to stay home that day, there would have been no way they could have convinced the American people that the towers were brought down by terrorists.

      • Antonio Solis

        Some of the top people had been told not to go to work that day.

    • Antonio Solis

      $2 BILLION DOLLARS. that’s why.

      • JD

        Was hell of alot more then 2 billion, more like 2 trillion+ they are still making money off that day

      • for all the answers

    • kootzie

      Regardless of the who/what/when/where/how/why of 9/11, it is obvious that at its core, the American government views people as disposable / dispensable….
      and are psychosociopathic liars.

      Even IF one suspends critical thinking and accepts the official propaganda package that OBL masterminded the hit, etc. etc. etc.
      The number of people killed on 9/11 is a tiny fraction of those killed by the government using retaliation as the pretext for Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Syria, Afghanistan.
      (But they were mostly brown people so that dont count)
      Even the number of people killed in Amerikkka by the government in the WarOnDrugs (c) is far more than on 9/11. (except, whew, a lot of them are brown and black people …)
      The number of people killed by corporations, helped by the government, in Amerikkka – directly and indirectly – is massive; 9/11 isn’t even a statistical blip in those numbers.

      To allow oneself to believe that the government ( I’m talking about the DeepState core – not the people at the DMV or the (almost extinct) EPA etc) could not/would not do X Y Z because of “those poor people” is delusional.
      They are YOUR enemy too, except you are waaaaay down on their target list (until you stop believing the bullshit)

      Specific to 9/11 here’s a quick summary :

      • Gary Youree

        This country is under heavy censorship. The two most important, but taboo, subject are the psychopathic elite vs humanity since the dawn of the agricultural revolution – and the end stages of global capitalism – maintained, manipulated, and monopolized, by the only real division within the species of mankind – the psychopath.
        The reality TV series, the US government and the corporate news exist only to distract.

  • Theresa Crosby

    then tell me why 3,000 people had to die in a controlled demolition. it seems like a senseless loss of life. if it was orchestrated by our government.

    • MileHigh

      There was no controlled demolition. Planes slammed into the buildings, they got excessively hot from the burning fire, the metal failed and the buildings collapsed.

  • Admas Imhotep

    Remember the pilot a supposedly only flew SIM planes. How perfect do you have to be to hit a building in perfect angle. Have you ever thrown a baseball?

  • phl

    He really is a wacko

  • Richard Norgard

    I worked for the government. Trust me, they can keep secrets when they want to. The way these things work, even if someone talks, they are discredited, made to look silly. If anyone does believe them, those people are accused of wearing tin foil hats. Sound familiar?

  • Richard Norgard

    You keep repeating this over and over and yet you have yet to demonstrate any understanding of basic physics yourself. Interesting.

    • MileHigh

      Yeah sure. The burning fire produces thermal heat power and that is modeled as a power source injecting (voltage x current) into a capacitor with a bleeder resistor to ground. The capacitance is the thermal capacity of the objects burning in the cavity and the resistor is the thermal resistance between the burning cavity and the outside world. The injection of continuous power into the capacitor will elevate the voltage on the capacitor until the amount of power exiting the cavity through the resistor is equal to the power injection. The voltage on the capacitor is the temperature. The voltage/temperature stabilizes at such a high level that it is hot enough to soften or melt metal. It is a much higher temperature than the jet fuel actually burns at.

  • Richard Norgard

    Ok that made no sense.

  • Richard Norgard

    You keep hitting that paste button like you have a muscle spasm.

  • Randy Burbach

    The actual article contains a box that essentially says “yeah, this is BS, but it is technically interesting BS.”

  • Dale Keyes

    Popular Mechanics brought in experts who debunked all the conspiracies that were ( and still are ) out there! If you get the History channel, and maybe a few others, watch them or go to history and you should be able to find that show! 911 could have been prevented if Bill Clinton did more during his Presidency when the same terrorist group attacked the WTC in Feb 1993!

  • Norman Blanchard

    Actually the first stealth plane had its first successful test in 1944 it was a Horten 2-29 similar looking to a B-2

  • Norbert Schroeder

    People find it hard to believe that their Zionist controlled government would kill that many innocents to start a war, ask how many jewish managers or office bosses died that day, you will find they stayed home.

  • Christopher Smith

    The building was brought down with the help of our fucken !!!! GOVERNMENT!!!!! PERIOD!!!!!… I’VE BEEN WORKING on Air Force planes for over 18 years you can’t even bump into one without causing $$$$$worth of damage the nose that plane of those planes could not penetrate them steel beams and go completely through them buildings like they did and come out the other side without even a dent and that’s exactly what they did

    • Craig Vandertie

      So the support beams were melted through right before the impact by the airliners, is that what you are saying?

      Diana is completely skeptical in regards to the support beams being melted through, as I said would that not be short work for a substance such as

      • Christopher Smith

        Not before the airplanes hit .

        • Craig Vandertie

          Even Thermite would take time to melt or almost melt through the I-beams, there is no other way you could pull it off.

          My point is detonating the Thermite before the Jets collided would be necessary.

  • John

    Two people can keep a secret if one of them is dead.

    Although since 911 happened in the first year of the Bush/Cheney Al-queada recruitment drive, I find it hard to believe that this was cooked up in what 10 months? Unless you also factor in that the election was rigged.

  • Paul

    Building SEVEN

    • MileHigh

      There is a very good documentary that explains how and why Building Seven collapsed. Just search for it and watch it.

  • N K.

    No Planes in Washington or Pennsylvania were found. I personally know someone who survived the attack in the Pentagon. There was a Plane and one in Pennsylvania or did all those people just vanise off the face of the earth.

  • Truth_in_Defense

    The collapses are totally connected to the very clear signs of the plane crash sites. And if there was something of exploders in side the World Trade Centers….they would not have been at those predictable exact sites. The third building mystery collapse was totally the ground of these supposed asserted exploiter issue.

  • Joseph Patterson

    I am an engineer with a degree in Engineering Physics and a deep interest in architecture. I understand the rather unique structure of these buildings, and have followed the explanations of their collapse. I concur completely with the original analysis of the collapse, and I won’t detail it here. Beyond that, however, it makes no sense that anyone other than a terrorist would wantonly kill so many diverse people without regard for who they were. I consider this story to be a potboiler plant, and nothing more.

  • Peter Harris

    I was there that morning… Saw it happen with my own eyes.

  • michael starnes
  • Ken Kuban

    Round up the traitors

  • Craig Vandertie

    So, they are saying that people went through all 3 buildings planting charges at key structural points and no 1 noticing this event, would someone explain to me how such an event could have taken place?

    Seems like a NSA secret ops. to me, meaning it was a conspiracy between Dick Cheney and G. Dubbs top military as a ruse to convince us we needed to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, WMDs existing under the rule of Saddam Hussein when Saddam had the last of his chemical weapons destroyed no later than 1998.

    As for why did all those people need to die, to make the ruse believable, if we they people knew it was our own POTUS and his staff responsible for the destruction of the WTC we would have never supported an invasion of Afghanistan and questioned the value to us as a whole in the invasion of Iraq, neither would have ever happened.

  • Craig Vandertie

    Thermite could

  • Patrick Veal


    • MileHigh

      You make a compelling argument.

  • Dan Dettmann

    Oh, is that right?
    Tell me…how come Bin Laden denied involvement in 911?
    Terrorist don’t do that.
    Also…how come the FBI didn’t indict Bin Laden for 911 saying they didn’t have the evidence?

    You’re right…steel melts…and did.
    But not from kerosene (jet fuel) that doesn’t burn nearly hot enough to melt steel…but thermite melts steel and a military grade thermite was found in dust samples.

    You need to run down to Wally World and buy you some tin foil. 😛

  • Eleanor LeTourneau

    There was a tv special on it a couple years ago of a company doing their job in bring down buildings, think they even did a few in Vegas. They said that when building are close they like to bring them straight down so as not to damage other buildings nearby, you try to do as little damage as possiable. Have to say they all mostly looked like the twin towers going down.

  • Eleanor LeTourneau

    There were two planes in that area that day andif you look at the pictures were it supposedly went in the hole was too small for that size plane, plus there were some people nearby and one a Vietiam vet said it sounded like and incoming bomb (or drone) and that he heard enough of them to know.

  • David Bartleson

    Actually the firefighters who responded did report hearing explosions. And there is a video where you can here it you.

  • Eleanor LeTourneau

    Am curious then, why during an earthquake and buildings pancake down why didn’t any of the 3 buildings look like them? The floors below the fire were intact and not burned.

  • Eleanor LeTourneau

    What about earthquakes that bring down big buildings I have never seen buildings disinergrate like the towers. Big hotels pancake during earthquakes shouldn’t the towers have done something like them too.

  • Eleanor LeTourneau

    And Death is or threath of is a good sealer of the mouth. Plus the Pentagon is missing Trillions of dollars no one knows what happened to it. Money also can buy a lot of silence.

  • Eleanor LeTourneau

    Still would like explained the explosions some people and firemen heard and the explosion in the basement heard by a worker. The petrol tanks did not explode and cars did not either. Just curious.

    • Eleanor LeTourneau

      Watched some films of the towers and if listen carefully you can hear them.

  • Eleanor LeTourneau

    They weren’t the only ones William Rodriguez a janitor who took care of the stairwells was. Go to and listen to him at Freedom Law School. I remember hearing about him that day and some of the things that happened then and later when he tried to tell what he heard and saw. If see fit please share.

  • Jonathan Bowen

    There are just a lot of really dumb people who think there’s a conspiracy around every corner, just waiting to get them. They have serious psychological issues.

  • HisMajestyOKeefe

    Get back on your medications

  • r wood

    Steel is MADE.. Forms by HEAT. Period. in an ENCLOSED space.. it’s an OVEN and….trust me.. it gets HOT in a jet engine. Do you see coal burning airliners? No. Coal used to be how you’d heat up a BLAST FURNACE. Back in the day… WOOD fired forges to do Iron.
    Sure… you can take a slab of steel, dump a couple gallons of Kerosene on it and.. no big deal. In an ENCLOSED place… even a couple gallons is significant. Then….. 10,000 Gallons.. that WILL get damn hot.
    To claim Heat will not melt STEEL .. it’s goofy. To say JET FUEL does not get HOT…..CRAZY.

    Try this…drain all the water from the radiator and see how far your car goes before major engine fail. Trust me……the METAL will warp,crack, fail… and you have a dead engine. The incoming fuel… is just a PINHOLE

    Do you know there’s pizza ovens that run on WOOD, on COAL and can hit 700f? Parts in Jet Engines are NOT made of generic steel.

    So… in a STRUCTURE….. they do NOT assume Jet Engine Temps. They have beams and girders, nuts, bolts,rivets and those have KNOWN strengths, , Compressive, tensile. ANY given steel has an approximate strength at NORMAL temps, but ANY steel if heated much loses strength.

    As a COOK I know that a BASIC steel 10″ knife won’t cost much, but ….won’t get very sharp. a knife that’s $25-45 is better, a knife that’s $80-130… more BETTER Then there’s EXTREME. Real big $.
    the DIFFERENCE is the STEEL. You want TOUGH but also a high Rockwell hardness. High hardness means a SHARP edge that stays sharp. The no Name $15 knife won’t GET very sharp.. Nor stay however sharp. The Knife with Hitachi Blue Steel or a VG-10 core.. will get damn sharp and hold the edge. Then there’s “powder metalurgy”… even MORE hard/sharp/costly.

    The Steel in Girders……is built to bear load and be CHEAP. THOUSANDS of TONS? You ain’t wanting to PAY to get Hi tech steel. It’s not MADE for Rockwell Hardness nor High Temp tolerance.

    I mentioned the knives cooks use well… Cooks won’t put their knives in a commercial dishwasher… the HEAT can weaken the temper. also.. may harm the handle. My wood handle knives, got a coat of Man-O War spar varnish.. which holds up well to a HOME dish machine. Home machines can’t GET real hot.. so…it will not change the steel.

  • r wood

    The AREA struck,burning was holding up hundreds of tons. When the STEEL loses strength…where weakest… that weight buckles beams and girders. The Pancaking, is like a giant HAMMER so 20-30 floors slam down and the structure is not just facing heat + weight, but IMPACT.

    I can say that ….THOUSANDS of Gallons of Jet Fuel can generate HEAT. I can not authenticate the data here… nor am I sure FEMA did such a study.

    I MEANWHILE see ZERO way that an INTENTIONAL demolition/mass murder has any “u[side”. I FAIL to see how the hell some secret crew wires these buildings to be taken down.. and synchronizes it with Al Qaeda. I am WILLING to believe that dirty business and crazy stuff has been done.. This? Nope , sorry, nope.

    WHO the hell orchestrates such a diabolic scheme and… how can you keep the SECRET? What If? What if someone exposes EVER YTHING? Huh?

  • maturallite

    So cool. Thanks for sharing. This is exactly what I was talking about.

  • maturallite

    Someone from another thread posted this to one of my comments. The guy doesn’t present his arguments very respectfully, but he does demonstrate the point I was trying to make about how heat weakens steel.

  • eyesuntzu .

    The article is BS, aka speculation. Why does thefreethoughtproject post speculation and lies about 9/11.
    The editors know the article is BS but are polite and explain…
    This feature is somewhat different from our usual purely scientific articles, in that it contains some speculation. However, given the timing and the importance of the issue, we consider that this feature is sufficiently technical and interesting to merit publication for our readers. Obviously, the content of this article is the responsibility
    of the authors””
    CD is a lie made up by a fringe few, and not backed with evidence. Hopefully lies like this article will not inspire people to become the next McVeigh, or Boston bomber.
    Who did the CD in the fantasy version imagined in the speculative, aka BS, article. How was the fantasy CD done? lol, this and other questions will create a singularity gish gallop smoke screen of woo. lol, this is funny if not such a dumb lie about the murder of thousands by 19 nuts for UBL.

  • Tom Murphy

    It is simply false to claim that Europhysics News (EPN) “concluded that 9/11 was controlled demolition when:

    1. That very article has a disclaimer which states “This feature is somewhat different from our usual purely scientific articles, in that it contains some speculation. ”

    2. That very article’s disclaimer clearly states, “Obviously, the content of this article is the responsibility of the authors.”

    3. That very journal also stated that, “EPN is a magazine that publishes a range of news and views to stimulate discussion – unlike peer reviewed research which would be published in a scholarly journal” AND THAT “A counter article is to be published.”

    So you are not being honest when you post what you do. Regardless if you want to believe whatever it is you want to believe about 9/11, it doesn’t give you a right to misrepresent what that journal actually says and what their position actually is. They did NOT “conclude” what you claim.

    That isn’t a situation of belief, we can read what they wrote and it shows that they did NOT “conclude” anything about it. They published disclaimers with that article and made it clear it was just the speculation of the authors of that article. So your headline is false. Europhysics News made a point of publishing a counter article:

  • Marco Alzapiedi

    What a load of bolox