Home / Badge Abuse / Cops are Programmed to Kill and the Growing Epidemic of Police Shooting Dogs is Proof

Cops are Programmed to Kill and the Growing Epidemic of Police Shooting Dogs is Proof

“In too much of policing today, officer safety has become the highest priority. It trumps the rights and safety of suspects. It trumps the rights and safety of bystanders. It’s so important, in fact, that an officer’s subjective fear of a minor wound from a dog bite is enough to justify using potentially lethal force, in this case at the expense of a 4-year-old girl. And this isn’t the first time. In January, an Iowa cop shot and killed a woman by mistake while trying to kill her dog. Other cops have shot other kidsother bystanderstheir partnerstheir supervisors and even themselves while firing their guns at a dog. That mind-set is then, of course, all the more problematic when it comes to using force against people.”—Journalist Radley Balko

John W. Whitehead | The Rutherford Institute

dogs

Almost two years after the firestorm that took place in Ferguson, Missouri, when a white police officer shot an unarmed black teenager and militarized police descended in a brutal show of force to quell local protests, not much has really changed for the better.

Unarmed Americans are still getting shot by police with alarming regularity.

SWAT teams are still bursting through doors, terrorizing families and leaving lives and property shattered. In one incident, a Kansas SWAT team erroneously raided the home of two former CIA analysts after police observed family members shopping at a gardening store and found loose-leaf tea (mistaken for marijuana) in the family’s trash can.

And the military industrial complex is still making a killing (literally and figuratively) at taxpayer expense from the transformation of small-town police forces—“kitted out with Marine-issue camouflage and military-grade body armor, toting short-barreled assault rifles, and rolling around in armored vehicles”—into extensions of the military.

What has changed is the extent to which Americans—easily distracted by all of the political mumbo jumbo being bantered around—seem to have stopped paying attention or being outraged about revelations of government corruption, wrongdoing and outright abuse.

Part of this ignorance can be attributed to the failure of the mainstream media to report on what’s really taking place in the American police state. As The Huffington Post reports, “The media has turned its sights to the heated presidential election, burning through the oxygen that had given life to stories about police brutality and reform.”

Another part of this apathy can be chalked up to a widespread desensitization to police violence, thanks to the growing availability and accessibility of surveillance and camera footage. As Salon points out, “the increased visibility of trauma and death at the hands of cops” has resulted in “the deadening of our collective senses.”

And yet another part of this indifference seemingly stems from the fact that we just don’t value human life as much as we should. How many Americans seem unconcerned about the carnage inflicted on civilians worldwide as a result of the nation’s bloody, endless wars abroad? As The Washington Post makes clear, the end result of ignoring these civilian casualties and burying memories of war’s destruction is more wars, more blowback, and more innocent blood on our hands.

If there’s one area where Americans do seem to still get outraged, it’s in relation to their pets, who occupy a sizeable place in their hearts, homes and wallets.

According to newspaper editors, “stories about animal abuse often generate more responses from upset readers than articles about violence directed toward humans.” Reports from police agencies support the claim that “shooting a dog brings more heat down on an agency than an officer-involved shooting of a human.”

READ MORE:  Dog Rescuer Visited By Homeland Security for Making Facebook Posts About Cops Shooting Dogs

Prepare to be outraged.

A dog is shot by a police officer “every 98 minutes.”

The Department of Justice estimates that at least 25 dogs are killed by police every day.

The Puppycide Database Project estimates the number of dogs being killed by police to be closer to 500 dogs a day(which translates to 182,000 dogs a year).

Because not all police departments keep track of canine shootings, these numbers vary widely. However, whatever the final body count, what we’re dealing with is an epidemic of vast proportions.

Incredibly, in 1 out of 5 cases involving police shooting a family pet, a child was either in the police line of fire or in the immediate area of a shooting.

The so-called “dangerous” breeds of dogs aren’t the only ones that are being killed in encounters with police either.

Journalist Radley Balko has documented countless “dog shootings in which a police officer said he felt ‘threatened’ and had no choice but to use lethal force, including the killing of a Dalmatian (more than once), a yellow Lab , a springer spaniel, a chocolate Lab, a boxer, an Australian cattle dog, a Wheaten terrier, an Akita… a Jack Russell terrier… a 12-pound miniature dachshund… [and] a five-pound chihuahua.”

Essentially, police can shoot your dog for any reason or no reason at all.

What’s more, the general consensus from the courts thus far has been to absolve police from charges of wrongdoing. Conversely, while police routinely receive little blowback for shooting family pets, shooting a police dog can land you in just as much trouble as if you shoot a human being: for instance, a teenager who shot and killed a police dog received a23-year prison sentence.

Outraged yet?

Not to worry. I’m just getting warmed up.

Spike, a 70-pound pit bull, was shot by NYPD police when they encountered him in the hallway of an apartment building in the Bronx. Surveillance footage shows the dog, tail wagging, right before an officer shot him in the head at pointblank range.

Arzy, a 14-month-old Newfoundland, Labrador and golden retriever mix, was shot between the eyes by a Louisiana police officer. The dog had been secured on a four-foot leash at the time he was shot. An independent witness testified that the dog never gave the officer any provocation to shoot him.

Seven, a St. Bernard, was shot repeatedly by Connecticut police in the presence of the dog’s 12-year-old owner. Police, investigating an erroneous tip, had entered the property—without a warrant—where the dog and her owner had been playing in the backyard, causing the dog to give chase.

Dutchess, a 2-year-old rescue dog, was shot three times in the head by Florida police as she ran out her front door. The officer had been approaching the house to inform the residents that their car door was open when the dog bounded out to greet him.

Yanna, a 10-year-old boxer, was shot three times by Georgia police after they mistakenly entered the wrong home and opened fire, killing the dog, shooting the homeowner in the leg and wounding an investigating officer.

READ MORE:  Body Cam: Cop Ignores Dog Sign, Hops Fence in Response to a Burglar Alarm, Kills Homeowners Dog

Payton, a 7-year-old black Labrador retriever, and 4-year-old Chase, also a black Lab, were shot and killed after a SWAT team mistakenly raided the mayor’s home while searching for drugs. Police shot Payton four times. Chase was shot twice, once from behind as he ran away. “My government blew through my doors and killed my dogs. They thought we were drug dealers, and we were treated as such. I don’t think they really ever considered that we weren’t,” recalls Mayor Cheye Calvo, who described being handcuffed and interrogated for hours—wearing only underwear and socks—surrounded by the dogs’ carcasses and pools of the dogs’ blood.

In another instance, a Missouri SWAT team raided a family home, killing a 4-year-old pit bull Kiya. Believe it or not, this time the SWAT raid wasn’t in pursuit of drugs, mistaken or otherwise, but was intended “to check if [the] home had electricity and natural gas service.”

Mind you, these are not isolated instances.

There are websites, community action organizations and Facebook groups that do nothing but publicize dog shootings by police, and there are a lot of them. One filmmaker, Andrea B. Scott, has even put together a documentary to raise awareness about the epidemic.

Clearly, our four-legged friends are suffering at the hands of a police state in which the police have all the rights and the citizenry (and their “civilian” dogs) have little to none.

As always, we have to dig down deep to understand why is this happening.

Are family dogs really such a menace to police? Are law enforcement agents really so fearful for their safety—and so badly trained—that they have no recourse when they encounter a dog than to shoot? Finally, are police shootings of dogs really any different than police shootings of unarmed citizens?

First off, dogs are no greater menace to police than they are to anyone else. After all, as the Washington Post points out, while “postal workers regularly encounter both vicious and gregarious dogs on their daily rounds… letter carriers don’t kill dogs, even though they are bitten by the thousands every year. Instead, the Postal Service offers its employees training on how to avoid bites.”

Second, these dog shootings epitomize a larger, societal problem with law enforcement agencies prioritizing an “officer safety” mindset that encourages police to shoot first and ask questions later. We’d have a lot fewer police shootings (of dogs and unarmed citizens) if police weren’t quite so preoccupied with “officer safety” at the expense of all else.

As commentator William Norman Grigg pointed out, “A peace officer is paid to assume certain risks, including those necessary to de-escalate a confrontation… A ‘veteran’ deputy with the mindset of a peace officer would have taken more than a shaved fraction of a split-second to open fire on a small male individual readily identifiable as a junior high school student, who was carrying an object that is easily recognizable as a toy—at least to people who don’t see themselves as an army of occupation, and view the public as an undifferentiated mass of menace.”

Third, these dog killings are, as Balko recognizes, “a side effect of the new SWAT, paramilitary focus in many police departments, which has supplanted the idea of being an ‘officer of the peace.’” Thus, whether you’re talking about police shooting dogs or citizens, the mindset is the same: a rush to violence, abuse of power, fear for officer safety, poor training in how to de-escalate a situation, and general carelessness.

READ MORE:  Instead of Using His Taser, Cop Shoots, Kills Mentally Ill Elderly Woman 'Armed' with a Bat

That paramilitary focus has resulted in a government mindset that allows SWAT teams and other government agents to invade your home, break down your doors, kill your dog (the dog always gets shot first), wound or kill you, damage your furnishings and terrorize your family.

This is the same mindset that sees nothing wrong with American citizens being subjected to roadside strip searches, forcible blood draws, invasive surveillance, questionable exposure to radiation and secret government experiments, and other morally reprehensible tactics.

Unfortunately, this is a mindset that is flourishing within the corporate-controlled, military-driven American police state.

So what’s to be done about all of this?

In terms of our four-legged friends, many states are adopting laws to make canine training mandatory for police officers. As dog behavior counselor Brian Kilcommons noted, officers’ inclination to “take command and take control” can cause them to antagonize dogs unnecessarily. Officers “need to realize they’re there to neutralize, not control… If they have enough money to militarize the police with Humvees, they have enough money to train them not to kill family members. And pets are considered family.”

Frankly, police should also be made to undergo classes annually on how to peacefully resolve and de-escalate situations with the citizenry. While they’re at it, they should be forced to de-militarize. No one outside the battlefield—and barring a foreign invasion, the U.S. should never be considered a domestic battlefield—should be equipped with the kinds of weapons and gear being worn and used by local police forces today. If the politicians are serious about instituting far-reaching gun control measures, let them start by taking the guns and SWAT teams away from the countless civilian agencies that have nothing to do with military defense that are packing lethal heat.

Finally, there will be no end to the bloodshed—of unarmed Americans or their family pets—until police stop viewing themselves as superior to those whom they are supposed to serve and start acting like the peace officers they’re supposed to be. Ultimately, this comes down to better—and constant—training in nonviolent tactics, serious consequences for those who engage in excessive force, and a seismic shift in how the law enforcement agencies and the courts deal with those who transgress.

As I point out in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, when you’re trained to kill anything that poses the slightest threat (imagined or real), when you’ve been instructed to view yourself as a soldier and those you’re supposed to serve as enemy combatants on a battlefield, when you can kill and there are no legal consequences for your actions, and when you are deemed immune from lawsuits holding you accountable for the use of excessive force, then it won’t matter what gets in your way. Whether it’s a family pet, a child with a toy gun, or an old man with a cane—you’re going to shoot to kill.

Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead [send him mail] is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. He is the author of A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State and The Change Manifesto (Sourcebooks).

Copyright © 2016 The Rutherford Institute

  • Malcolm McLean

    In another instance, a Missouri SWAT team raided a family home, killing a 4-year-old pit bull Kiya. Believe it or not, this time the SWAT raid wasn’t in pursuit of drugs, mistaken or otherwise, but was intended “to check if [the] home had electricity and natural gas service.”

    Really – a SWAT team checking on home utilities?

    • Bob Btme

      as always, FTP provides links to everything, try reading the linked article first.

      I don’t see this as a training issue, more of an accountability one. These guys are guilty of felony animal cruelty and should be prosecuted as such. They’re violent criminals.

      Does it matter after the psycho shoots a dog whether or not he was trained? no, it matters whether the victims will receive justice.

      • Will Crump

        Amen!! The more the LE community is allowed to skate by on, the more they’ll do. They’re just like kids. The more kids realize they can get away with, the more they’ll do and the bolder they’ll become as they go!!

  • billdeserthills

    I don’t care who you are–You hurt my dog and you will be buried for it

    • Nexdeceptus

      You shoot someone’s dog, your shooting a family member. In the first place I don’t allow ANY LE on my property for any reason because all they have on their mind is to kill something regardless of what the situation is. Their just hoping for a chance to pull the trigger at something, acting like a 10 year old with a BB gun. I agree. LE shoots my dog and your dead. It’s a knee jerk reaction that lasts until I’m out of bullets.

  • morsextenebris

    This goes to show that these bastards do not represent the people they are supposed to be serving, but instead are looking out for the interests of their handlers, from the corporate municipality to the corporate UNITED STATES INC. That is not to say that there are no good policemen(peace officers?), but they had better step up to the plate and start policing their own ranks from the blatant corruption as seen from the public’s view. Do your homework gentlemen and find out who you really work for and where you stand as an American!

  • Drogan

    Well, I guess we may have more effect is we use #doglivesmatter, since black lives mean nothing. It’s not like blacks are real people, right?

    • Deuce_2112

      If you believe that, you’ve been played for the perfect sucker. It doesn’t matter WHAT color the lives taken are, they don’t care. As long as they have the people going at each other’s throats they have all the excuse they need to stomp us all underfoot. And if you won’t even try to see beyond the BS you’ve been fed, then you’re already lost.

      • nojack

        Damn Straight!

        • Will Crump

          Dang skippy!! As long as they can keep the public distracted and divided, they’ll keep doing what their doing all the while laughing at our inane stupidity!!

  • Kountry Bumpkin

    That’s why I couldn’t care less that SS members are getting killed by BLM members, lets just be honest, we’ve been in a collapse for years now and it’s reached a point that it’s getting harder and harder for the elite to hide, when SHTF all these SS members will not survive a week because there’s somebody out there they’ve done wrong that will make sure they never see another sunrise. They have slaughtered everything from pets, deaf and mute people to a one armed one legged old man holding an ink pen to a naked old lady with a cane. The reality of those “few bad apples” is that not a single one of them is qualified to wipe asses in a nursing home, can you imagine some little old lady with Alzheimer’s slapping an SS member while laughing her head off (had this happen to me once), the SS would empty a full magazine into her before she could blink.

  • Ibcamn

    if a grown man is so scared of puppy’s…he needs to find another job…cowards and pussy’s,that is all cops are,besides criminals i mean…..cowardly criminals…..

    • Deuce_2112

      A lot of cops are bullies with badges, who are not picked for their ability to think things through, but to obey orders.

      • Ibcamn

        how very true……………

      • Will Crump

        A lawyer once applied to be a police officer and was turned down. Why?? He was overqualified for the job! I guess if you’re smart enough to walk and chew gum at the same time you’re overqualified to be a cop.

        Maybe the cops of today were the helpless little pansies that were bullied on the school playground…the ones that got their lunch and milk money taken every day and now they’re out for payback.

        People can really be animals the first time they get a title and a little taste of authority. It goes right to their heads!!

    • Will Crump

      Couldn’t have said it any better myself, lbcamn!! There are some compassionate, level-headed officers out there, but the ego-tripping, cool sunglasses-wearing, trigger-happy, power tripping bullies have them far outnumbered it seems.

  • Eric Bolt

    Most of these Police Thugs were trained in Iraq or Afghanistan where Murder was the way to do it-! considering this, they should not be used to Patrol the Streets of America-! unless it is a Terrorist Neighborhood like Dick Cheney’s-!

  • lheurebleue

    Afraid for their safety, my ass. They enjoy killing.

    • Will Crump

      Yes because they KNOW they can get away with it every time. They know they’re part of “the system” and “the system” always protects its own.

      Look at Mark Foley. He was soliciting teen-age boys on capital hill; a felony that would have landed any of the rest of us in prison for over a decade and on the sex offender registry with a child predator tag to boot. But he was a Senator. What did he get? Rehab for alcoholism and a free pass. Alcoholism has nothing to do with ephebophilia!!

      I know this isn’t exactly on point for unrestrained police brutality, but it does illustrate very well the double standard between “us” and “them”.

      One thing that would help immensely is if the American public would pull it’s head out of its self-absorbed rear end and realize that WE THE PEOPLE ARE THE GOVERNMENT. So many look at the government as separate and independent from “We the people.”

  • nojack

    You shoot my dog and I shoot you! Plain and Simple!

  • Prince

    Police Pukes = Pyschopaths / Sociopaths