homes

When the city of Los Angeles refused to address an epidemic of homelessness — seen in sprawling and dangerous tent cities — a struggling musician answered the call and built dozens of solar-powered tiny houses to give those down on their luck a place to call home.

Elvis Summers crowdfunded tiny homes in part through his nonprofit, Starting Human, and raised over $100,000 for what he viewed as a decent, if temporary, solution. And with the help of volunteers in the contracting and construction business, built some 40 tiny homes of wood with steel-reinforced, locking doors to provide solid shelter for struggling tent-city residents.

Summers, who experienced houselessness in his 20s, viewed the little, self-sufficient houses as a creative solution to L.A.’s colossal homeless issue — particularly as the wooden structures provided a solid home base for those seeking jobs or drug and alcohol treatment.

Summers’ project went swimmingly — individuals who’d survived in flimsy tents with little to no security felt the dignity of a structure to call home base.

That is, until the city of Los Angeles put its foot down, kicked several tiny home residents, out, and transported the structures for demolition.

“About my house, you know, you know I had a peace of mind,” Willie Hadnot told NPR shortly after losing his home. “I could shut the door, go lay down, quiet. And that’s what I miss a whole lot, man. I don’t want to start crying.”

Advertisment

Suddenly evicted tiny house residents weren’t permitted to retrieve their few belongings — including medications — before police and garbage trucks hauled the homes away.

Summers managed to pack up a few of the tiny homes on public property, but was forced to evict residents, himself — simply in hopes of saving the structures from the city.

City Council had met to address L.A.’s notorious homeless issue, and councilmembers and local residents expressed outrage over the tiny homes they deemed eyesores and mere bandaids for the greater problem.

“When the city took those three houses, they chose to do it at the exact same time that the council and the mayor were at City Hall unveiling the mayor’s new homeless $1.27 billion plan,” Summers explained.

That plan seeks to create permanent transitioning housing for the homeless, among other programs, but does not immediately address the city’s crisis.

Summers’ tiny houses — which cost around $1,200 to produce — have a wood frame and shell, include a solar power system, a camping toilet, two windows with alarms, and, most importantly for residents, a steel door with deadbolt

— are indeed temporary, but offer a roof, walls, and relative security in the interim.

Living in tents provides neither security or dignity and can make procuring a job or beating an addiction a seeming impossibility. These tiny houses constituted a jumping off point — a sturdy base — for residents to rely on.

Summers acknowledged to Reason the structures don’t answer what underpins the city’s immense homelessness problem, but explained the houses have their place in working toward solutions.

“The tiny houses provide immediate shelter,” the 39-year-old musician from South L.A. told Reason. “People can lock their stuff up and know that when they come back from their drug treatment program or court or finding a job all day, their stuff is where they left it.”

Scrambling to guard one’s few possessions, and the uncertainty important belongings — such as a cell phone or copies of a resume or clothing — might not be where you left them is an insidious stressor for many people without homes. Summers noted he never intended the tiny houses to be a permanent solution, rather, they could provide an intermediate step as the city solidifies other programs and housing options.

“When you’re homeless,” tiny home resident Kevin Green told NPR, “your day is consumed with, you know, that you don’t have a place to store your things so you’re walking around carrying all this stuff with you, you know, what can you get accomplished?”

But Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti doesn’t see the tiny homes as sufficient.

“Unfortunately, these structures are a safety hazard,” Garcetti’s spokeswoman, Connie Llanos, said in March, after several houses were confiscated. “These structures, some of the materials that were found in some of them, just the thought of folks having some of these things in a space so small, so confined, without the proper insulation, it really does put their lives in danger.”

Additional controversy and conflict with local, permanent residents arose from the location of a smattering of these tiny homes. While many nestled onto private property — like a parking lot — donated to the cause, others sprung up on highway overpasses and in neighborhoods, much to the chagrin of locals who viewed the shelters as safety hazards and nuisances.

After amending an ordinance for clearing homeless ‘villages,’ police and city sanitation workers descended on several areas where tiny homes were located, and confiscated the properties without providing notice or allowing dwellers to gather their possessions. Locals cheered the move while a number of people found themselves worse off than before Summers’ homes provided shelter.

“You go out and spend, you know, many nights on the street and be treated as a monster, and then be given a warm place to stay and tell me you’re not going to call it a home,” Summers told Reason in an interview.

Under intense national criticism, Los Angeles returned the seized tiny homes to residents in May — sans the solar-power systems which provided much-needed lighting — with the advisement Summers only locate the structures on private property.

Stalling over the red tape of further ‘studying the issue,’ the city of Los Angeles refuses to back Elvis Summers’ tiny home project, as well as additional creative solutions offered by others.

Meanwhile, tent cities continue popping up and the city’s many vacant lots, which could easily be bases for temporary tiny home communities, simply grow weeds.

SHARE
Claire Bernish began writing as an independent, investigative journalist in 2015, with works published and republished around the world. Not one to hold back, Claire’s particular areas of interest include U.S. foreign policy, analysis of international affairs, and everything pertaining to transparency and thwarting censorship. To keep up with the latest uncensored news, follow her on Facebook or Twitter: @Subversive_Pen.
  • the chik

    Boy you sure seem to think you know how these people live. First off people where letting them park on their property and apparently they didn’t have all these issues you’re claiming. Secondly many (actually most) homeless people do work and several are vet’s. I put up many people in my community who have fallen on hard times and lost their homes, in fact there’s currently 3 of them here and guess what. None of them are on drugs. The only one not working has applications in all over town but has no experience because she was a housewife, and even she finds ways of pitching in on the bills by doing odd jobs throughout the week. Whoever told you that only worthless drug addicts who wont work are homeless lied to you. It can happen to the best of us.

  • crazytrain2

    Good for this guy, but you can’t put up a more permanent structure on public property. Tents can be moved easily if the city or state gets a burr up their ass about a tent city. I go out with groups providing healthcare for the homeless as a police liaison. It has helped me become even more empathetic towards this population, but there are certainly things that they could do to help themselves not get evicted from public property owned by the state or a city. The biggest issue is cleaning up after themselves. When there is trash that is knee deep and human waste, along with needles-it draws attention and calls to action. I have found that providing trash bags helps with this issue, but some don’t even use them and simply throw their trash into the river. I can tell you that the clean camps have never been removed by the state(all the tent cities are under bridges and on state property) but the ones that look like a tornado hit do get cleaned up and everything gets thrown away.

  • AlphaLady777

    How dare this courageous, loving American interfere with the Agenda 2030 Depopulation Plan to kill-off 6 billion people – starting with the homeless, chronically-ill, disabled veterans, elderly, and other vulnerable Americans. These non-productive members of society have been placed on the “Death Waiting List” — and the clock is being sped up…….. Die, die, die! 6 billion more –die.

  • Whitecrow RadhaMa

    Yep – the tents are evidently safer? Really? Still, this is the USA and the USA is not different in that respect to any other idiot western world $ focussed society – all are too thick to understand that it is even economically beneficial to THEMSELVES to ensure that homeless people have some safety and that a structure that locks is safer than a tent that doesn’t. Duh.