Skip to main content

Hartford, CT — On September 11, 2015, journalist and police accountability activist, Michael Picard was illegally detained for lawfully open carrying and filming police on public property. During the illegal detainment, Connecticut state troopers confiscated his gun and his camera. However, the trooper who took the phone went on to make a critical mistake -- he left the camera rolling while conspiring with fellow officers to falsely charge Picard.

This week, it was revealed by the department that they investigated themselves and found they did nothing wrong when they conspired to frame an innocent man.

“They were exonerated,” police union attorney Mark Dumas said. “The troopers didn’t do anything wrong. They were doing their jobs, and they do an excellent job.”

An attorney for Picard told the Free Thought Project that they essentially expected the cops to exonerate themselves and noted that it doesn't affect their civil case against the department.

“We all should be so lucky to be in charge of investigating ourselves,” Picard's attorney Joseph R. Sastre said.

"The State Police internal affairs report has no bearing on our civil case. It's not even based on a complaint by my client. The state police command initiated the internal "investigation" themselves after the story broke. Months after Michael's arrest. That they concluded the investigation by exonerating themselves should surprise nobody. We never made a citizen's complaint. Because we never had any faith in them to conduct a legitimate internal affairs investigation. A police department's internal affairs report cannot be used as evidence in a court of law for good reasons. First and foremost, because they can be initiated and conducted for completely self-serving reasons," Sastre told TFTP.

"I’m not surprised they exonerated themselves. It has no bearing on our civil case. We are in the middle of the discovery phase and will continue to conduct discovery and prepare to try, and win, this case. Which I am confident we will do."

On that September night, Picard and a friend were on public property and warning drivers of a DUI checkpoint ahead. They were several hundred yards from the checkpoint and not interfering at all when troopers drove up, without lights on, and against the flow of traffic, to begin harassing the two gentlemen.

Trooper First Class John Barone, Sergeant John Jacobi, and Trooper Jeff Jalbert falsely claimed that Picard was waving his gun around and pointing it at people. However, Picard was holding a sign the entire time and did not touch his gun. Also, as you will see below, the officers admit that they were lying.

“Police should be focused on public safety, not punishing protesters and those who film public employees working on a public street,” said ACLU-CT legal director Dan Barrett, who is representing Picard in the lawsuit. “As the video shows, these police officers were more concerned with thwarting Mr. Picard’s free speech and covering their tracks than upholding the law.”

Had Picard actually been waving a gun, these troopers would have approached the situation in an entirely different manner, with guns drawn and possible SWAT backup. However, they did no such thing, because there was clearly no threat from the activists.

The fact that there was no threat did not stop the subsequent assault, however.

Two troopers approached Picard while forcefully removing his gun and then grabbing his camera, falsely claiming it is illegal to film. When Picard informs the officer can legally film here, the officer ignorantly asserts that "It's illegal to take my picture. Personally, it is illegal."

"Did you get any documentation that I am allowing you to take my picture"? asks the cop.

When Picard attempts to explain to the aggressive officer that he doesn't need a permit because he is on public property, the trooper then makes the asinine declaration that, "No I'm not (on public property). I'm on state property. I'm on state property."

State-owned roadways and right of ways are public property. The trooper's assertion that it is illegal to film on his 'state property' was entirely false and in violation of Connecticut Bill No. 245, which "protects the right of an individual to photograph or video record peace officers in the performance of their duties."

Scroll to Continue

Recommended for You

All this aggressive and unlawful behavior of these troopers, however, was about to come back to haunt them. After illegally confiscating the camera -- the trooper forgot to stop it from recording.

What happened next was a behind the scenes glimpse of what it looks and sounds like when cops lie to charge innocent people with crimes.

The corruption starts as an unidentified trooper begins to search for anything that these gentlemen may have done to make up charges against them. However, they were clean. At this point, Trooper first class Barone chimes in describing how they now have to charge these men with something to justify their harassment and subsequent detainment.

"Want me to punch a number on this? Gotta cover our ass," explains the trooper as they begin conspiring.

"Let's give him something," says an unidentified trooper, pondering the ways they can lie about this innocent man.

"What are they going to do? Are they going to do anything?" says Sergeant Jacobi, noting that they are entirely innocent.

"It's legal to do it," he continues,describing how the actions of the two activists are completely legal, before going on to make up charges on them.

"I think we do simple trespass, we do reckless use of the highway and creating a public disturbance," Jacobi says as he makes up these false charges against innocent people. "All three are tickets."

Once they figure out the false charges to raise, the officers then brainstorm a story of lies to back them up.

"And then we claim that, um, in backup, we had multiple, um," the unidentified trooper stutters as he makes up his fake story. "Um, they (the non-existent complainants) didn't want to stay and give us a statement, so we took our own course of action."

The corrupt cops had then solved their fake case, lied about a cover story, and were set to charge an innocent man with three crimes -- all in a day's work.

But there was just one more thing.... "Oh shit!" blurts out the cop as he realizes their entire scandalous corrupt conversation was just recorded. Apparently, however, the officer felt that it must not have recorded their conversation as the phone was returned.

The cops then gave the innocent man back his weapon, and it's back to the DUI checkpoint for them -- to harass and detain more innocent people.

“Community members like me have a right to film government officials doing their jobs in public, and we should be able to protest without fearing political retribution from law enforcement,” said Picard. “As an advocate for free speech, I’m deeply disappointed that these police officers ignored my rights, particularly because two of the troopers involved were supervisors who should be setting an example for others. By seeking to hold these three police officers accountable, I hope that I can prevent the same thing from happening to someone else.”

Watch the video below and remember that this can happen to anyone anywhere and at any time. All a corrupt cop has to do to ruin the lives of those they do not like, is make up a lie and get their fellow cops to corroborate that lie. Had the cop not left the video going, Picard's situation would be much different and the world would think he's a criminal.

“The evidence clearly shows that these police officers violated Mr. Picard’s rights,” said Sastre, who defended Picard against the criminal charges and is joining Barrett to represent Picard in the civil case. “We are confident that the court will agree, and we hope that it will send a strong message to police and the public alike that enforcing the law means respecting free speech, not trampling on it.”